Connect with us

General News

Petition filed for investigation into alleged impersonation of Adwoa Safo during parliamentary sittings

Published

on

Three individuals have petitioned the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) to investigate allegations that an unidentified woman may have appeared in Parliament while holding herself out as then Dome-Kwabenya Member of Parliament, Sarah Adwoa Safo, during parliamentary proceedings in November 2021 and March 2022.

The petition, dated September 15, 2026, was submitted by Emmanuel Mawanye Kotin, Edwin Godwin Buckman, also known as Ebo Buckman, and Dr Ramzi Inusah.

The petitioners are seeking what they describe as a formal and impartial investigation into the identity of the woman shown in video footage and photographs associated with the parliamentary sittings of November 30, 2021, and March 29, 2022.

The petition was addressed to the Director-General of the then Bureau of National Investigation (BNI), now operating as the National Intelligence Bureau, with copies sent to the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Inspector-General of Police, Speaker of Parliament, Clerk to Parliament and Controller of the Ghana Immigration Service.

According to the petition, the disputed sittings involved Parliament’s consideration and approval of the 2022 Budget Statement on November 30, 2021, and the passage of the Electronic Transfer Levy (E-Levy) Bill, 2022 on March 29, 2022.

The petitioners say video footage and still photographs circulated publicly during and after the November 2021 sitting, prompting some observers to question whether the woman occupying or associated with the Dome-Kwabenya parliamentary seat was actually Adwoa Safo.

Adwoa Safo, however, subsequently rejected the allegation and maintained that she was personally present in Parliament on the dates in question.

The petitioners stress that they are not presenting the allegation of personation as a fact. Rather, they want investigators to determine the identity of the woman in the disputed material and establish whether any criminal, security or parliamentary wrongdoing occurred.

They also acknowledge that Adwoa Safo’s denial is material evidence and should be considered fairly alongside the allegation.

A key concern raised in the petition is that, to the petitioners’ knowledge, the competing claims have not been resolved through a publicly reported forensic examination of the original video footage alongside Parliament’s contemporary attendance, access and security records.

They argue that an authoritative investigation could either clear Adwoa Safo and Parliament of what they describe as a continuing allegation or, if the allegation is substantiated, establish whether there were security failures, unlawful access, falsification of official records or assistance by other persons.

The petitioners also acknowledge the considerable time that has passed since the events occurred.

They argue, however, that the passage of time should not replace institutional fact-finding with speculation. They want investigators to determine what records were created, whether those records still exist and, where records have been destroyed, when and under what authorised retention or disposal policy that occurred.

The petition refers to Article 104 of the 1992 Constitution, which governs the determination of questions in Parliament and the applicable quorum.

The petitioners state that the mere presence of a non-member in the Chamber would not automatically invalidate a parliamentary decision.

They argue that any constitutional consequence would depend on evidence showing that the person was counted as a Member of Parliament, participated in a vote, affected the quorum or numerical result, or caused an official record to falsely reflect the presence or vote of the elected Member.

They further clarify that they are not asking investigators to declare the parliamentary proceedings invalid, noting that any such constitutional determination would be for a court with the appropriate jurisdiction.

The petition also refers to Section 134 of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29), which concerns personation.

It states that applying the provision would require proof of all the statutory ingredients, including the identity assumed by the person, the accused person’s knowledge and the intention required by law.

Depending on the evidence, the petition says, investigators could also uncover possible aiding and abetting, unlawful access, falsification or use of official records, or another offence.

The petitioners therefore want the facts investigated first and the appropriate legal characterisation determined from the evidence rather than beginning with a predetermined criminal charge.

The petition also recognises constitutional protections relating to parliamentary proceedings.

It cites Article 115 of the Constitution concerning parliamentary speech, debate and proceedings, as well as Parliament’s authority over contempt under Article 122 and the Speaker’s control of the Chamber and parliamentary records.

The petitioners say their complaint is not intended to challenge protected parliamentary speech or debate.

Instead, they say it concerns the alleged physical assumption of a Member’s identity by someone who may not have been a Member.

They have therefore asked investigators to work formally with the Speaker and Clerk to Parliament and obtain relevant parliamentary records through lawful processes that respect parliamentary privilege and institutional autonomy.

The petition makes a distinction between the proposed investigation and previous legal proceedings concerning the E-Levy.

It notes that Supreme Court proceedings challenging the passage of the Electronic Transfer Levy involved a different parliamentary sitting and issues concerning quorum and proof.

The petitioners say they are not seeking to reopen those proceedings or invalidate the E-Levy legislation, which has since been repealed.

Instead, their request is limited to the alleged personation during the November 30, 2021 proceedings and the March 29, 2022 sitting at which the E-Levy Bill was passed, as well as any criminal, security or institutional responsibility arising from the alleged conduct.

The petition identifies several specific matters for investigation.

Investigators are being asked to establish:

  1. The true identity of the woman shown in the original parliamentary video and photographic material from November 30, 2021 and March 29, 2022.
  2. Whether Adwoa Safo was physically present in Parliament at the relevant times and whether she entered through an authorised access point.
  3. The provenance, completeness and authenticity of the disputed recordings, including whether publicly circulated copies were edited, compressed, mislabelled or taken from another date.
  4. The relevant Hansard, Votes and Proceedings, division or voting records, attendance registers, accreditation records, CCTV recordings, official broadcast footage, access-control logs and security occurrence books.
  5. Whether the woman shown spoke, voted, was counted for quorum, signed any record, used a Member’s access credentials or otherwise participated in parliamentary business.
  6. Whether any parliamentary official, Member, security officer or another person can identify the woman or explain her entry, presence or movements.
  7. Whether anyone knowingly facilitated, authorised, encouraged, concealed or subsequently falsified a record connected to the alleged conduct.
  8. Whether relevant records still exist and, if they do not, the applicable retention policy, date and authority for their destruction or disposal.
  9. Whether the evidence establishes personation or another offence, security breach, contempt or misconduct, and identifies anyone responsible.

The petitioners are asking for a preliminary assessment, followed, if the evidential threshold is met, by a formal criminal investigation.

They are also seeking formal liaison with the Speaker and Clerk to Parliament to ensure the lawful preservation, identification and production of relevant records.

Other requests include:

  • Forensic authentication and comparison of the original recordings with publicly circulated copies.
  • Interviews with Adwoa Safo and relevant Members of Parliament.
  • Interviews with parliamentary officials, security personnel, media personnel and other identifiable witnesses.
  • Investigation into possible facilitation, unlawful access, falsification of records, concealment or related criminal conduct.
  • Referral of matters falling exclusively within Parliament’s disciplinary or contempt jurisdiction to the Speaker.
  • Referral of any prosecutable offence to the Attorney-General in accordance with the law.
  • Written acknowledgement of the petition and, subject to lawful confidentiality requirements and the rights of affected persons, communication of the eventual outcome to the petitioners.

The petitioners say they are prepared to provide complete, unedited copies of relevant recordings and documents in their possession.

They have also offered information concerning the source and chain of custody of the materials and requested an opportunity to make a formal statement and identify the specific portions of the material on which the petition is based.

They stressed that the investigation should be conducted without a public presumption of guilt, arguing that the public interest is served both by clearing a person who has been wrongly accused and by ensuring accountability where credible evidence establishes wrongdoing.

The petition was signed by: Emmanuel Mawanye Kotin, Edwin Godwin Buckman (Ebo Buckman), Dr Ramzi Inusah

Copies of the petition were also directed to the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Inspector-General of Police, Speaker of Parliament, Clerk to Parliament and Controller of the Ghana Immigration Service.

The petition includes a schedule of proposed annexures covering the disputed video footage, still images, source and publication records, official parliamentary broadcast recordings, Hansard and Votes and Proceedings, a statement or interview from Adwoa Safo, witness information and any recent material that prompted the petition.

It also lists links to recordings identified as relating to the parliamentary proceedings of November 30, 2021 and March 29, 2022.

Sarfo

General News

GTA Regional Directors Raise Concerns Over CEO Maame Efua Houadjeto’s Leadership

Published

on

Fourteen Regional Directors of the Ghana Tourism Authority (GTA) have raised concerns about the leadership approach of the Authority’s Chief Executive Officer, Maame Efua Houadjeto, during a meeting with the Board of Directors to address what they describe as persistent organisational challenges.

The meeting, held on Monday, October 12, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., was convened to discuss issues the Regional Directors say have remained unresolved since July 2026.

According to the Directors, the engagement was not intended to serve as an arbitration process but rather to obtain responses to questions and concerns they had previously raised.

During the meeting, the Directors expressed their displeasure with the CEO’s leadership approach, highlighting concerns about stakeholder engagement, regional coordination and other issues they believe are affecting the effective operation of the Authority.

They indicated that the concerns extend beyond individual disagreements and touch on broader institutional matters that require attention to ensure the smooth functioning of the GTA.

The Directors maintained that their position was motivated by the need to safeguard the integrity of the institution and restore effective operations across its regional structures.

They also called on the Board of Directors to facilitate a formal response from the Office of the CEO to the issues raised, stressing the need for the concerns to be addressed through the appropriate institutional channels.

The engagement provided an opportunity for the Regional Directors to formally communicate their grievances to the Board and seek its intervention in resolving the outstanding matters.

The meeting ended with a call for further intervention by the Board of Directors to ensure that the issues raised receive the necessary attention and responses.

It remains unclear what specific questions have been pending since July, what responses the Regional Directors expect from the CEO, or what steps the Board intends to take following the meeting.

The outcome of any subsequent engagement between the Board, the CEO and the Regional Directors is expected to be important in determining how the concerns will be addressed and how coordination within the Authority will be strengthened.

Continue Reading

General News

Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, Son of Ghana’s First President, Dies in Cairo

Published

on

Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, son of Ghana’s founding President, Osagyefo Dr Kwame Nkrumah, has died in Cairo, Egypt, following a prolonged illness.

The Nkrumah family announced his death in a statement posted on the Facebook page of Samia Nkrumah, daughter of Ghana’s first president.

According to the statement, Gamal passed away peacefully in Cairo, where he had been receiving care at a rehabilitation centre after suffering a stroke.

The family described him as a beloved son, respected journalist, writer and intellectual who dedicated much of his life to examining the political, social and cultural developments shaping Africa and the wider world.

It said Gamal remained deeply committed to the ideals of justice, human dignity, African unity and international solidarity throughout his life.

As a journalist and commentator, he used his voice and intellect to analyse issues affecting Africa and the international community, earning recognition among friends, colleagues and readers who valued his insights and perspectives.

The family further described him as a man of profound intellectual curiosity, independent thought and quiet conviction, noting that he carried forward his father’s legacy in his own distinctive way while building a reputation based on his personal principles and achievements.

His death, the family said, represents a significant loss not only to his relatives and loved ones but also to the wider community of people who appreciated his work, humanity and engagement with important issues of his time.

The statement added that the family remembers Gamal with immense love, gratitude and pride, describing his wisdom, kindness and commitment to his values as an enduring source of inspiration.

The Nkrumah family also expressed appreciation to those who supported Gamal throughout his illness, particularly the medical professionals and caregivers in Cairo who provided him with treatment and care.

It extended its gratitude to the governments and people of both Egypt and Ghana for their support during the difficult period.

The family has appealed to the public to respect its privacy as it mourns the loss.

Details of memorial arrangements and opportunities for the public to pay tribute to Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah’s life and legacy, according to the statement, will be communicated in due course.

https://web.facebook.com/share/p/1DTR2Ht1fH/

Continue Reading

General News

FOUR PROFESSORS SUE TO HALT GIMPA RECTOR SEARCH PROCESS AMID CONTROVERSY

Published

on

Four professors at the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) have filed a lawsuit seeking to halt aspects of the process to select a search committee for the appointment of a new Rector, escalating tensions over the institution’s leadership transition.

The plaintiffs are Professors Lord Mawuko Yevugah, Wisdom Akpalu, Kwami Adanu and Patrick Tandoh-Offin. They filed the action on October 5, 2026, challenging aspects of the process involving the Chairman of GIMPA’s Governing Council, the Institute’s Secretary and the Rector.

At the centre of the dispute is the Convocation register used to determine who could vote for representatives on the Rector Search Committee. The professors contend that about 30 newly appointed or promoted lecturers were included on the register despite questions over whether their appointments had received the necessary approval from the Governing Council.

They argue that allowing the lecturers to participate in the election could undermine the legitimacy of the process and have asked the court to ensure that the selection of the search committee complies with GIMPA’s 2020 Statutes. They also want the committee’s composition and the respective roles of the Governing Council and Convocation clarified.

GIMPA management, however, has indicated that a special ad hoc committee audited the Convocation register and confirmed that those listed had valid appointments, based on Human Resource Management records. Exceptions reportedly applied to staff on leave of absence or secondment.

The Convocation election proceeded on October 6. According to reports, Professor Patrick Tandoh-Offin contested to represent the professorial class but lost to Professor Emmanuel Gyamfi Numapau, who received 118 votes against Tandoh-Offin’s 35.

The legal challenge comes as GIMPA prepares for the end of Rector Professor Samuel Kwaku Bonsu’s tenure in August 2027. The Institute’s statutes require the search process to begin ahead of the incumbent’s departure.

The case raises questions about voting eligibility, institutional governance and the procedures for selecting the next Rector. The court’s determination could affect the process, although the available reports do not establish that an injunction has been granted or that the election

Continue Reading

General News

EPA ORDERS IMMEDIATE HALT TO UNAPPROVED RECLAMATION WORKS NATIONWIDE — GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, CONTRACTORS ON NOTICE

Published

on

The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has ordered an immediate halt to all land reclamation, mine-site rehabilitation, dredging and water-body restoration activities being undertaken without the requisite environmental permits across Ghana.

In a public notice issued on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, the Authority warned that institutions, companies, contractors and individuals operating without its approval must cease work immediately and report to the nearest EPA regional office or its head office for regulatory assessment.

The directive applies to both public and private projects, including government-sponsored, privately funded and donor-supported initiatives. The EPA specifically mentioned the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources, Forestry Commission, Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Minerals Commission and Mineral Development Fund among the institutions required to ensure compliance.

Under Regulation 40 of the Environmental Protection (Environmental Assessment) Regulations, 2025 (L.I. 2504), reclamation and restoration activities fall within Ghana’s environmental assessment and permitting framework.

The covered activities include rehabilitating abandoned mining sites, backfilling excavated areas, restoring degraded land, revegetation, dredging and desilting rivers, modifying river channels and restoring polluted water bodies, wetlands and aquatic ecosystems.

The Authority stressed that securing a contract, obtaining funding approval, holding a mining lease or receiving authorisation from another public institution does not replace an EPA Environmental Permit. Similarly, consent from traditional authorities, memoranda of understanding and participation in government programmes cannot substitute for the required approval.

Contracting institutions have also been directed to verify the environmental permit status of projects before allowing contractors to mobilise to their sites.

The EPA acknowledged the importance of restoring lands and water bodies damaged by illegal and irresponsible mining but cautioned that rehabilitation efforts must not create further environmental destruction by bypassing regulatory safeguards.

It warned that individuals and institutions that continue unapproved operations after the notice would face action in accordance with applicable Ghanaian laws.

The directive reinforces the Authority’s position that environmental restoration, regardless of its funding source or purpose, must comply with the country’s permitting requirements.

Continue Reading

General News

North Korea and China Open Long-Delayed Bridge

Published

on

The opening of the long-awaited New Yalu River Bridge marks a significant step towards strengthening cross-border transport and trade between China and North Korea.

China and North Korea have officially opened a major bridge linking the two countries, ending a 12-year delay that kept the infrastructure project unused despite its completion in 2014.

The New Yalu River Bridge connects the Chinese border city of Dandong, in Liaoning province, with Sinuiju in North Korea. The four-lane crossing stretches approximately three kilometres across the Yalu River and is expected to improve the movement of goods between the neighbouring countries.

The project was originally intended to begin operating in 2014. However, the opening was postponed for years as infrastructure on the North Korean side, including connecting roads and customs facilities, remained incomplete. Analysts have also pointed to strained bilateral relations and disagreements surrounding economic cooperation as possible contributing factors.

Trade and economic implications

The new crossing is expected to ease pressure on the older China–North Korea Friendship Bridge, which has served as a major route for official trade between the two countries.

By providing additional road capacity, the new bridge could improve freight transportation, reduce congestion and support the movement of essential goods. Its strategic location is particularly important because China remains North Korea’s principal trading partner.

Nevertheless, the opening does not automatically guarantee a rapid increase in trade. International sanctions imposed in response to North Korea’s nuclear and weapons programmes continue to constrain economic activity, while the scale of future commercial traffic will depend on border arrangements and the two governments’ economic policies.

A signal of closer bilateral engagement

The bridge’s inauguration comes amid renewed diplomatic engagement between Beijing and Pyongyang. It also highlights China’s continued economic importance to North Korea as the latter seeks to maintain relationships with key regional partners.

For China, improved transport links could facilitate cross-border commerce and support economic activity in Dandong. For North Korea, the bridge offers additional capacity for importing goods and developing commercial infrastructure around Sinuiju.

However, the project’s long delay illustrates how political disagreements and economic considerations can obstruct infrastructure intended to improve regional connectivity.

What happens next?

Attention will now turn to how quickly the bridge becomes an established route for commercial traffic and whether the additional capacity translates into measurable growth in bilateral trade.

While the opening represents an important infrastructure milestone, its longer-term economic and diplomatic impact will depend on the willingness of both governments to sustain cooperation and the restrictions governing North Korea’s international trade.

The opening ends a lengthy wait for the two countries, but the bridge’s ultimate significance will be measured by the trade and cooperation it enables in the years ahead.

Continue Reading

Trending