General News
Socrate Safo questions La Pleasure Beach demolition, warns of threat to judicial due process
Creative-industry practitioner and concerned citizen Socrate Safo has criticised the demolition of structures at La Pleasure Beach, questioning the use of military force in a dispute involving indigenous land rights, commercial interests and an ongoing legal process.
In a lengthy Facebook post, Safo described the development as a troubling example of what he called “state muscle” being used at a time when questions surrounding ownership, leases and the rights of affected parties remain before the courts.
The demolition took place on Friday, October 2, 2026, with excavators operated by the military’s 48 Engineer Regiment reportedly used to pull down structures at the beach.
According to Safo, the development raises a broader question about the relationship between state power, indigenous land rights and the rule of law in Ghana.
He asked whether disputes involving state-backed commercial interests and indigenous communities should be resolved through military intervention and demolition or through the courts and established legal processes.
Safo argued that the La Pleasure Beach situation should not be treated simply as a routine land-clearing exercise, insisting that it has implications for property rights, traditional land ownership and judicial authority.
History of La Pleasure Beach dispute
Safo traced the relationship between the state and the La Traditional Council over the beach to years of tourism development and negotiations.
He said a 2002 Memorandum of Understanding reportedly established a working relationship between the Ghana Tourist Development Company Limited (GTDC) and the La Traditional Council, which represents traditional interests in the land.
According to him, disagreements later emerged over the management of the facility and revenue generated from the beach, eventually leading to litigation.
Safo said that in 2014, the High Court established a revenue-sharing arrangement involving proceeds from the beach.
Under the reported arrangement, 20 per cent of gate proceeds was allocated to the traditional landowners, 30 per cent went into a Community Youth Development Fund, while 50 per cent was allocated for operations.
While acknowledging that the arrangement may have faced disagreements and administrative challenges, Safo said such disputes were precisely why Ghana has courts.
He argued that corporate disagreements, management disputes, contractual claims and land ownership questions should be resolved through evidence and judicial decisions rather than what he described as the sudden arrival of military excavators.
Labadi Beach Hotel boundary dispute
Safo also focused on a longstanding boundary dispute involving La Pleasure Beach and the adjacent Labadi Beach Hotel, whose interests are linked to Hotel Investments (Ghana) Limited and the Social Security and National Insurance Trust (SSNIT).
He said the hotel’s position, as reported, is that some commercial entertainment facilities, particularly the Polo Beach Club, encroached on land belonging to the hotel.
Concerns have also reportedly been raised about noise, security and activities taking place close to the hotel.
Safo acknowledged that such concerns deserved to be addressed but said the historical claims of the La Traditional Council and businesses that had operated on the beachfront for decades should also be considered.
He pointed to traditional accounts suggesting that structures and activities associated with La Pleasure Beach had existed from around 1960, before the establishment of the Labadi Beach Hotel.
He also referred to claims that the chiefs of La had historically allowed the hotel’s boundary to extend beyond the Maale Stream as an act of goodwill.
Safo argued that if that history is accurate, such traditional accommodation should not automatically be interpreted decades later as permanent ownership without a proper legal determination.
He described the issue as one requiring careful judicial consideration.
Safo said the controversy escalated after Spartan-Ives Limited, operators of the Polo Beach Club, commenced legal proceedings on September 16, 2026, against Hotel Investments (Ghana) Limited and Richard Jakpa, Director of Special Operations at the National Security Council Secretariat.
According to Safo, Spartan-Ives relied on a 20-year lease obtained from the La Stool in 2022 for GH¢1.5 million.
He said the company also claimed to have invested more than GH¢41.3 million in the property.
Safo stressed that the validity of those claims is ultimately a matter for the courts.
However, he questioned why demolition was allowed to proceed if litigation was active and an application for an interlocutory injunction was pending.
He argued that the issue goes beyond the Polo Beach Club, saying it touches on the confidence that individuals, businesses and traditional authorities have in the judicial system.
“If a party can lose its property or investment before a judge has ruled on an injunction because another arm of the state has decided to act physically,” Safo argued, “then what confidence should citizens have in judicial protection?”
Safo warned that the situation could create a dangerous precedent if executive or state power is allowed to effectively determine a disputed matter before the courts have ruled.
He acknowledged that there could be legitimate national security concerns, unlawful encroachment or other reasons for state intervention.
However, he maintained that such circumstances should not automatically eliminate due process.
He argued that if there was an unlawful encroachment, the question should be who legally owns the land, while any alleged breach of a lease should be assessed based on the terms of that lease.
For Safo, the answer to such questions should come through the appropriate legal process rather than demolition.
Beyond the legal dispute, Safo raised concerns about the impact of the demolition on people whose livelihoods depend on activities at La Pleasure Beach.
He said reports indicate that nearly 5,000 beach vendors, workers and small-business operators have been affected.
He listed food vendors, drink sellers, fishermen, entertainers, cleaners, security personnel, artisans, transport operators and other small businesses among those whose incomes are connected to the beach.
According to him, the beach is not simply a recreational destination for these people but an important source of livelihood.
Safo therefore questioned whether there was a transition programme for people whose businesses had been disrupted.
He said any government that demolishes or disrupts an economic ecosystem has a responsibility to explain how the resulting human and economic consequences will be addressed.
Concerns ahead of December tourism season
Safo also raised concerns about the timing of the demolition, coming just weeks before Ghana’s major December tourism season.
He noted that December has become an important period for Ghana’s tourism and hospitality industry, attracting visitors from the diaspora and other parts of the world.
According to him, beach entertainment, restaurants, nightlife, events and cultural experiences form part of the tourism ecosystem.
He therefore questioned whether destroying major commercial activity at an established coastal entertainment destination shortly before the peak season could have wider economic consequences for businesses, workers and the tourism sector.
Safo further questioned whether there was a coordinated plan involving the Ministry of Tourism before the action was carried out.
He said if allegations that the ministry was not adequately involved are accurate, it would raise questions about how major decisions affecting tourism infrastructure are being coordinated.
Safo also referred to the reported confrontation between La Dade-Kotopon MP Rita Naa Odoley Sowah and military personnel at the site.
He said the incident had further exposed the political sensitivity surrounding the demolition.
He also questioned the role of the National Security Secretariat, arguing that although national security remains an important component of the state, its powers should not become a substitute for the courts, regulatory agencies, ministries or traditional dispute-resolution mechanisms.
Safo said institutions with significant state power must be subject to transparency and accountability.
‘La is bigger than one beach’
In his concluding argument, Safo said the La Pleasure Beach controversy is bigger than the Polo Beach Club, Labadi Beach Hotel, SSNIT, the La Traditional Council or individual commercial interests.
He said the matter concerns whether indigenous communities can have confidence that their traditional land rights will be respected, whether investors can trust that contractual and property rights will be protected, and whether court processes will be respected.
He also questioned whether the government should deploy coercive state power against citizens while a legal dispute remains before the judiciary.
Safo acknowledged the legitimate role of government in protecting public land, enforcing planning regulations, preventing unlawful development and safeguarding national security.
However, he maintained that such enforcement must operate within the law.
He warned that the government must be particularly careful when exercising coercive powers in the middle of private or commercial disputes.
Safo said Ghana had spent decades building institutions intended to replace the rule of force with the rule of law, including the courts, regulatory bodies, ministries and institutions recognising traditional authorities and customary land rights.
He argued that the La Pleasure Beach situation should therefore become a national conversation about the limits of state power.
He warned that if state power is allowed to replace judicial due process, the consequences could extend far beyond La.
“I am just a concerned citizen and creative-industry practitioner,” Safo stated.
He added a disclaimer that the references used in his write-up were based on information available in the public domain and that he was willing to be corrected on any inaccuracies.
General News
GTA Regional Directors Raise Concerns Over CEO Maame Efua Houadjeto’s Leadership
Fourteen Regional Directors of the Ghana Tourism Authority (GTA) have raised concerns about the leadership approach of the Authority’s Chief Executive Officer, Maame Efua Houadjeto, during a meeting with the Board of Directors to address what they describe as persistent organisational challenges.
The meeting, held on Monday, October 12, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., was convened to discuss issues the Regional Directors say have remained unresolved since July 2026.
According to the Directors, the engagement was not intended to serve as an arbitration process but rather to obtain responses to questions and concerns they had previously raised.
During the meeting, the Directors expressed their displeasure with the CEO’s leadership approach, highlighting concerns about stakeholder engagement, regional coordination and other issues they believe are affecting the effective operation of the Authority.
They indicated that the concerns extend beyond individual disagreements and touch on broader institutional matters that require attention to ensure the smooth functioning of the GTA.
The Directors maintained that their position was motivated by the need to safeguard the integrity of the institution and restore effective operations across its regional structures.
They also called on the Board of Directors to facilitate a formal response from the Office of the CEO to the issues raised, stressing the need for the concerns to be addressed through the appropriate institutional channels.
The engagement provided an opportunity for the Regional Directors to formally communicate their grievances to the Board and seek its intervention in resolving the outstanding matters.
The meeting ended with a call for further intervention by the Board of Directors to ensure that the issues raised receive the necessary attention and responses.
It remains unclear what specific questions have been pending since July, what responses the Regional Directors expect from the CEO, or what steps the Board intends to take following the meeting.
The outcome of any subsequent engagement between the Board, the CEO and the Regional Directors is expected to be important in determining how the concerns will be addressed and how coordination within the Authority will be strengthened.
General News
Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, Son of Ghana’s First President, Dies in Cairo
Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, son of Ghana’s founding President, Osagyefo Dr Kwame Nkrumah, has died in Cairo, Egypt, following a prolonged illness.
The Nkrumah family announced his death in a statement posted on the Facebook page of Samia Nkrumah, daughter of Ghana’s first president.
According to the statement, Gamal passed away peacefully in Cairo, where he had been receiving care at a rehabilitation centre after suffering a stroke.
The family described him as a beloved son, respected journalist, writer and intellectual who dedicated much of his life to examining the political, social and cultural developments shaping Africa and the wider world.
It said Gamal remained deeply committed to the ideals of justice, human dignity, African unity and international solidarity throughout his life.
As a journalist and commentator, he used his voice and intellect to analyse issues affecting Africa and the international community, earning recognition among friends, colleagues and readers who valued his insights and perspectives.
The family further described him as a man of profound intellectual curiosity, independent thought and quiet conviction, noting that he carried forward his father’s legacy in his own distinctive way while building a reputation based on his personal principles and achievements.
His death, the family said, represents a significant loss not only to his relatives and loved ones but also to the wider community of people who appreciated his work, humanity and engagement with important issues of his time.
The statement added that the family remembers Gamal with immense love, gratitude and pride, describing his wisdom, kindness and commitment to his values as an enduring source of inspiration.
The Nkrumah family also expressed appreciation to those who supported Gamal throughout his illness, particularly the medical professionals and caregivers in Cairo who provided him with treatment and care.
It extended its gratitude to the governments and people of both Egypt and Ghana for their support during the difficult period.
The family has appealed to the public to respect its privacy as it mourns the loss.
Details of memorial arrangements and opportunities for the public to pay tribute to Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah’s life and legacy, according to the statement, will be communicated in due course.
General News
FOUR PROFESSORS SUE TO HALT GIMPA RECTOR SEARCH PROCESS AMID CONTROVERSY
Four professors at the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) have filed a lawsuit seeking to halt aspects of the process to select a search committee for the appointment of a new Rector, escalating tensions over the institution’s leadership transition.
The plaintiffs are Professors Lord Mawuko Yevugah, Wisdom Akpalu, Kwami Adanu and Patrick Tandoh-Offin. They filed the action on October 5, 2026, challenging aspects of the process involving the Chairman of GIMPA’s Governing Council, the Institute’s Secretary and the Rector.
At the centre of the dispute is the Convocation register used to determine who could vote for representatives on the Rector Search Committee. The professors contend that about 30 newly appointed or promoted lecturers were included on the register despite questions over whether their appointments had received the necessary approval from the Governing Council.
They argue that allowing the lecturers to participate in the election could undermine the legitimacy of the process and have asked the court to ensure that the selection of the search committee complies with GIMPA’s 2020 Statutes. They also want the committee’s composition and the respective roles of the Governing Council and Convocation clarified.
GIMPA management, however, has indicated that a special ad hoc committee audited the Convocation register and confirmed that those listed had valid appointments, based on Human Resource Management records. Exceptions reportedly applied to staff on leave of absence or secondment.
The Convocation election proceeded on October 6. According to reports, Professor Patrick Tandoh-Offin contested to represent the professorial class but lost to Professor Emmanuel Gyamfi Numapau, who received 118 votes against Tandoh-Offin’s 35.
The legal challenge comes as GIMPA prepares for the end of Rector Professor Samuel Kwaku Bonsu’s tenure in August 2027. The Institute’s statutes require the search process to begin ahead of the incumbent’s departure.
The case raises questions about voting eligibility, institutional governance and the procedures for selecting the next Rector. The court’s determination could affect the process, although the available reports do not establish that an injunction has been granted or that the election
General News
EPA ORDERS IMMEDIATE HALT TO UNAPPROVED RECLAMATION WORKS NATIONWIDE — GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, CONTRACTORS ON NOTICE
The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has ordered an immediate halt to all land reclamation, mine-site rehabilitation, dredging and water-body restoration activities being undertaken without the requisite environmental permits across Ghana.
In a public notice issued on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, the Authority warned that institutions, companies, contractors and individuals operating without its approval must cease work immediately and report to the nearest EPA regional office or its head office for regulatory assessment.
The directive applies to both public and private projects, including government-sponsored, privately funded and donor-supported initiatives. The EPA specifically mentioned the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources, Forestry Commission, Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Minerals Commission and Mineral Development Fund among the institutions required to ensure compliance.
Under Regulation 40 of the Environmental Protection (Environmental Assessment) Regulations, 2025 (L.I. 2504), reclamation and restoration activities fall within Ghana’s environmental assessment and permitting framework.
The covered activities include rehabilitating abandoned mining sites, backfilling excavated areas, restoring degraded land, revegetation, dredging and desilting rivers, modifying river channels and restoring polluted water bodies, wetlands and aquatic ecosystems.
The Authority stressed that securing a contract, obtaining funding approval, holding a mining lease or receiving authorisation from another public institution does not replace an EPA Environmental Permit. Similarly, consent from traditional authorities, memoranda of understanding and participation in government programmes cannot substitute for the required approval.
Contracting institutions have also been directed to verify the environmental permit status of projects before allowing contractors to mobilise to their sites.
The EPA acknowledged the importance of restoring lands and water bodies damaged by illegal and irresponsible mining but cautioned that rehabilitation efforts must not create further environmental destruction by bypassing regulatory safeguards.
It warned that individuals and institutions that continue unapproved operations after the notice would face action in accordance with applicable Ghanaian laws.
The directive reinforces the Authority’s position that environmental restoration, regardless of its funding source or purpose, must comply with the country’s permitting requirements.
General News
North Korea and China Open Long-Delayed Bridge
The opening of the long-awaited New Yalu River Bridge marks a significant step towards strengthening cross-border transport and trade between China and North Korea.
China and North Korea have officially opened a major bridge linking the two countries, ending a 12-year delay that kept the infrastructure project unused despite its completion in 2014.
The New Yalu River Bridge connects the Chinese border city of Dandong, in Liaoning province, with Sinuiju in North Korea. The four-lane crossing stretches approximately three kilometres across the Yalu River and is expected to improve the movement of goods between the neighbouring countries.
The project was originally intended to begin operating in 2014. However, the opening was postponed for years as infrastructure on the North Korean side, including connecting roads and customs facilities, remained incomplete. Analysts have also pointed to strained bilateral relations and disagreements surrounding economic cooperation as possible contributing factors.
Trade and economic implications
The new crossing is expected to ease pressure on the older China–North Korea Friendship Bridge, which has served as a major route for official trade between the two countries.
By providing additional road capacity, the new bridge could improve freight transportation, reduce congestion and support the movement of essential goods. Its strategic location is particularly important because China remains North Korea’s principal trading partner.
Nevertheless, the opening does not automatically guarantee a rapid increase in trade. International sanctions imposed in response to North Korea’s nuclear and weapons programmes continue to constrain economic activity, while the scale of future commercial traffic will depend on border arrangements and the two governments’ economic policies.
A signal of closer bilateral engagement
The bridge’s inauguration comes amid renewed diplomatic engagement between Beijing and Pyongyang. It also highlights China’s continued economic importance to North Korea as the latter seeks to maintain relationships with key regional partners.
For China, improved transport links could facilitate cross-border commerce and support economic activity in Dandong. For North Korea, the bridge offers additional capacity for importing goods and developing commercial infrastructure around Sinuiju.
However, the project’s long delay illustrates how political disagreements and economic considerations can obstruct infrastructure intended to improve regional connectivity.
What happens next?
Attention will now turn to how quickly the bridge becomes an established route for commercial traffic and whether the additional capacity translates into measurable growth in bilateral trade.
While the opening represents an important infrastructure milestone, its longer-term economic and diplomatic impact will depend on the willingness of both governments to sustain cooperation and the restrictions governing North Korea’s international trade.
The opening ends a lengthy wait for the two countries, but the bridge’s ultimate significance will be measured by the trade and cooperation it enables in the years ahead.
-
General News1 week agoWorld Cup Visa Storm: Kojo’s GTA Questions Resurface as Minority Demands Action
-
General News2 weeks agoSSNIT Unveils Big Plans to Transform Labadi, La Palm Beachfront into Tourism Hub
-
General News1 week agoPolitical communicators must prepare before speaking on teachers’ strike – Seth Afum Dankwah
-
Education2 weeks agoShould Schools Teach Students How to Handle Failure?
-
General News2 weeks agoUniversity of Ghana Announces Major Update on 2026/2027 Registration and Accommodation
-
General News2 weeks agoPolice Investigate Death of Three Children at Kobilmahigu; IGP Deploys Special Team
-
Politics1 week agoGeorge Krobea Asante Alleges Deliberate Delay in Voting Process
-
General News1 week agoUS Defense Department Cuts Ties With Anthropic Over AI Restrictions
