Connect with us

General News

‘Justice Must Be Equal’ — Minority Mounts Legal Challenge Against Wontumi Conviction

Published

on

Ghana’s Parliamentary Minority has launched a strong legal and political challenge against the High Court’s conviction of New Patriotic Party (NPP) Ashanti Regional Chairman Bernard Antwi-Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi, and Akonta Mining Limited, describing the judgment as constitutionally flawed and warning that it raises serious concerns about due process, judicial fairness and equal application of the law.

In a detailed statement dated July 20, 2026, and signed by Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin, the caucus insisted that its intervention was not intended to shield any individual from accountability but rather to defend constitutional governance and ensure that justice is administered fairly, transparently and without political bias.

The statement follows the High Court’s decision, delivered by Justice Audrey Kocuvie-Tay, which convicted Chairman Wontumi and Akonta Mining Limited on two counts each under the Minerals and Mining Act, 2006 (Act 703), as amended.

Minority Expresses Sympathy, Calls for Calm

The Minority extended its sympathies to Chairman Wontumi, his family, supporters and the NPP following what it described as the heavy burden imposed by the 20-year custodial sentence.

The caucus urged party supporters across Ghana and in the diaspora to remain calm and pursue lawful and constitutional means in expressing their dissatisfaction, warning against any acts of violence or disorder.

It further pledged to employ every available constitutional mechanism—including parliamentary oversight, legal advocacy and judicial processes—to challenge what it believes are significant legal defects in the judgment.

“Not an Attack on the Judiciary”

Although sharply critical of the ruling, the Minority emphasized that it continues to hold Ghana’s judiciary in high esteem.

According to the statement, questioning the legal reasoning behind a judgment should never be interpreted as an attack on judges or judicial independence.

The caucus stressed that appeals and public legal criticism are essential components of every constitutional democracy.

It also made clear that it was not questioning the personal integrity of Justice Audrey Kocuvie-Tay but believed the legal conclusions reached in the case deserved review by the appellate courts.

Minority Reaffirms Support for Anti-Galamsey Fight

The Parliamentary Minority reaffirmed its commitment to the fight against illegal mining, popularly known as galamsey.

It stated that it fully supports:

  • Accountability for environmental crimes.
  • Vigorous prosecution of illegal miners.
  • Equal enforcement of mining laws irrespective of political affiliation.

However, it argued that anti-galamsey prosecutions must be carried out fairly, consistently and without political selectivity.

According to the caucus, no Ghanaian should receive immunity because of political affiliation, but neither should anyone become a target of politically motivated prosecution.

Alleged Denial of Right to Counsel

One of the central constitutional concerns raised by the Minority relates to what it describes as the denial of Chairman Wontumi’s right to legal representation of his own choosing.

The statement argues that before judgment was delivered, the High Court had been informed that Wontumi’s lead counsel was engaged in professional duties outside Ghana.

Despite this, the court proceeded to deliver judgment.

The Minority contends that Article 19(2)(g) of the 1992 Constitution guarantees every accused person the right to be defended by a lawyer of their own choice and that such a right cannot be limited except under exceptional circumstances after every reasonable accommodation has been exhausted.

The caucus believes that proceeding in the absence of lead counsel raises serious constitutional questions regarding Wontumi’s right to a fair trial.

Comparison with Tsatsu Tsikata Precedent

Drawing comparisons with the legal battle involving former Ghana National Petroleum Corporation Chief Executive Tsatsu Tsikata, the Minority argued that constitutional protections must apply equally regardless of political affiliation.

It recalled that Tsikata’s conviction was overturned by the Court of Appeal in 2016 after concerns were raised about due process and constitutional violations during his trial.

The statement maintained that if constitutional rights and the right to counsel were considered fundamental in Tsikata’s case, then the same standards must equally apply to Chairman Wontumi.

“If the right to counsel of choice mattered in 2003, it matters in 2026,” the statement declared.

Refusal to Refer Constitutional Questions to Supreme Court

Another major issue highlighted by the Minority concerns the trial court’s refusal to refer constitutional questions raised by the defence to the Supreme Court.

According to the statement, Wontumi’s legal team sought constitutional interpretation regarding provisions of the Minerals and Mining Act under Article 130 of the Constitution.

However, Justice Kocuvie-Tay ruled that the constitutional issues were sufficiently clear and therefore did not require referral to the Supreme Court.

The Minority argued that this decision itself amounted to constitutional interpretation, a function reserved exclusively for the Supreme Court.

The caucus cited the Supreme Court’s decision in the Ex Parte Zanetor Rawlings case, arguing that once a genuine constitutional question arises, trial courts are obliged to refer the matter to the apex court.

Legal analysts referenced by the Minority believe the refusal to make such a referral may amount to a jurisdictional defect capable of invalidating the entire proceedings.

Questions Over Corporate Liability

The statement also challenged the High Court’s decision to lift the corporate veil of Akonta Mining Limited and hold Chairman Wontumi personally liable for the company’s alleged conduct.

According to the Minority, piercing the corporate veil is an exceptional legal remedy that should only be exercised in limited circumstances after careful judicial analysis.

It argued that the basis upon which the court imposed personal liability deserves close scrutiny during the appellate process.

Allegations of Selective Justice

Beyond constitutional concerns, the Minority accused the State of selectively enforcing anti-galamsey laws.

The statement questioned why investigations reportedly ordered in July 2025 by Attorney-General Dr. Dominic Akuritinga Ayine into allegations involving Joseph Yamin and Yakubu Abanga have yet to result in prosecutions or court appearances.

It also referenced reports concerning alleged illegal mining activities linked to the Member of Parliament for Prestea Huni Valley at the Apinto concession, claiming no prosecutions have followed despite public allegations.

By contrast, the Minority noted that Chairman Wontumi’s prosecution moved swiftly and culminated in a 20-year custodial sentence.

The caucus further pointed to the case involving the Member of Parliament for Asutifi North, who was arraigned in November 2025 for allegedly obstructing an anti-galamsey task force and granted bail of GH¢150,000, highlighting what it described as inconsistencies in prosecutorial speed and severity.

According to the Minority, such disparities risk creating a public perception that justice is not being applied equally.

Constitutional Equality Before the Law

The Minority maintained that the alleged disparities violate the spirit of Article 17 of the 1992 Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law.

It argued that constitutional protections should never depend on political affiliation and warned that inconsistent prosecution could undermine public confidence in Ghana’s justice system.

Calls for Action

The Parliamentary Minority is calling for:

  • A full appeal against Chairman Wontumi’s conviction.
  • Judicial review of the alleged denial of counsel of choice.
  • Review of the High Court’s refusal to refer constitutional questions to the Supreme Court.
  • Publication of the Attorney-General’s enforcement record on illegal mining cases involving individuals across the political divide.
  • Equal treatment of all accused persons regardless of political affiliation.

Broader Constitutional Implications

The caucus believes the Wontumi case has become a significant constitutional test for Ghana’s democracy.

It warned that unresolved jurisdictional concerns, questions over fair trial rights and allegations of selective prosecution could erode public confidence in both the judiciary and prosecutorial institutions if left unaddressed.

As appellate proceedings are expected to begin, the outcome of the case could shape future legal precedent regarding constitutional referrals, fair trial guarantees and prosecutorial discretion in politically sensitive cases.

The Minority concluded that its position is not a defence of illegal mining but rather a defence of constitutional governance, due process and equal justice under the law, insisting that every Ghanaian—regardless of political affiliation—is entitled to the full protection of the Constitution.

General News

GTA Regional Directors Raise Concerns Over CEO Maame Efua Houadjeto’s Leadership

Published

on

Fourteen Regional Directors of the Ghana Tourism Authority (GTA) have raised concerns about the leadership approach of the Authority’s Chief Executive Officer, Maame Efua Houadjeto, during a meeting with the Board of Directors to address what they describe as persistent organisational challenges.

The meeting, held on Monday, October 12, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., was convened to discuss issues the Regional Directors say have remained unresolved since July 2026.

According to the Directors, the engagement was not intended to serve as an arbitration process but rather to obtain responses to questions and concerns they had previously raised.

During the meeting, the Directors expressed their displeasure with the CEO’s leadership approach, highlighting concerns about stakeholder engagement, regional coordination and other issues they believe are affecting the effective operation of the Authority.

They indicated that the concerns extend beyond individual disagreements and touch on broader institutional matters that require attention to ensure the smooth functioning of the GTA.

The Directors maintained that their position was motivated by the need to safeguard the integrity of the institution and restore effective operations across its regional structures.

They also called on the Board of Directors to facilitate a formal response from the Office of the CEO to the issues raised, stressing the need for the concerns to be addressed through the appropriate institutional channels.

The engagement provided an opportunity for the Regional Directors to formally communicate their grievances to the Board and seek its intervention in resolving the outstanding matters.

The meeting ended with a call for further intervention by the Board of Directors to ensure that the issues raised receive the necessary attention and responses.

It remains unclear what specific questions have been pending since July, what responses the Regional Directors expect from the CEO, or what steps the Board intends to take following the meeting.

The outcome of any subsequent engagement between the Board, the CEO and the Regional Directors is expected to be important in determining how the concerns will be addressed and how coordination within the Authority will be strengthened.

Continue Reading

General News

Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, Son of Ghana’s First President, Dies in Cairo

Published

on

Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, son of Ghana’s founding President, Osagyefo Dr Kwame Nkrumah, has died in Cairo, Egypt, following a prolonged illness.

The Nkrumah family announced his death in a statement posted on the Facebook page of Samia Nkrumah, daughter of Ghana’s first president.

According to the statement, Gamal passed away peacefully in Cairo, where he had been receiving care at a rehabilitation centre after suffering a stroke.

The family described him as a beloved son, respected journalist, writer and intellectual who dedicated much of his life to examining the political, social and cultural developments shaping Africa and the wider world.

It said Gamal remained deeply committed to the ideals of justice, human dignity, African unity and international solidarity throughout his life.

As a journalist and commentator, he used his voice and intellect to analyse issues affecting Africa and the international community, earning recognition among friends, colleagues and readers who valued his insights and perspectives.

The family further described him as a man of profound intellectual curiosity, independent thought and quiet conviction, noting that he carried forward his father’s legacy in his own distinctive way while building a reputation based on his personal principles and achievements.

His death, the family said, represents a significant loss not only to his relatives and loved ones but also to the wider community of people who appreciated his work, humanity and engagement with important issues of his time.

The statement added that the family remembers Gamal with immense love, gratitude and pride, describing his wisdom, kindness and commitment to his values as an enduring source of inspiration.

The Nkrumah family also expressed appreciation to those who supported Gamal throughout his illness, particularly the medical professionals and caregivers in Cairo who provided him with treatment and care.

It extended its gratitude to the governments and people of both Egypt and Ghana for their support during the difficult period.

The family has appealed to the public to respect its privacy as it mourns the loss.

Details of memorial arrangements and opportunities for the public to pay tribute to Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah’s life and legacy, according to the statement, will be communicated in due course.

https://web.facebook.com/share/p/1DTR2Ht1fH/

Continue Reading

General News

FOUR PROFESSORS SUE TO HALT GIMPA RECTOR SEARCH PROCESS AMID CONTROVERSY

Published

on

Four professors at the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) have filed a lawsuit seeking to halt aspects of the process to select a search committee for the appointment of a new Rector, escalating tensions over the institution’s leadership transition.

The plaintiffs are Professors Lord Mawuko Yevugah, Wisdom Akpalu, Kwami Adanu and Patrick Tandoh-Offin. They filed the action on October 5, 2026, challenging aspects of the process involving the Chairman of GIMPA’s Governing Council, the Institute’s Secretary and the Rector.

At the centre of the dispute is the Convocation register used to determine who could vote for representatives on the Rector Search Committee. The professors contend that about 30 newly appointed or promoted lecturers were included on the register despite questions over whether their appointments had received the necessary approval from the Governing Council.

They argue that allowing the lecturers to participate in the election could undermine the legitimacy of the process and have asked the court to ensure that the selection of the search committee complies with GIMPA’s 2020 Statutes. They also want the committee’s composition and the respective roles of the Governing Council and Convocation clarified.

GIMPA management, however, has indicated that a special ad hoc committee audited the Convocation register and confirmed that those listed had valid appointments, based on Human Resource Management records. Exceptions reportedly applied to staff on leave of absence or secondment.

The Convocation election proceeded on October 6. According to reports, Professor Patrick Tandoh-Offin contested to represent the professorial class but lost to Professor Emmanuel Gyamfi Numapau, who received 118 votes against Tandoh-Offin’s 35.

The legal challenge comes as GIMPA prepares for the end of Rector Professor Samuel Kwaku Bonsu’s tenure in August 2027. The Institute’s statutes require the search process to begin ahead of the incumbent’s departure.

The case raises questions about voting eligibility, institutional governance and the procedures for selecting the next Rector. The court’s determination could affect the process, although the available reports do not establish that an injunction has been granted or that the election

Continue Reading

General News

EPA ORDERS IMMEDIATE HALT TO UNAPPROVED RECLAMATION WORKS NATIONWIDE — GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, CONTRACTORS ON NOTICE

Published

on

The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has ordered an immediate halt to all land reclamation, mine-site rehabilitation, dredging and water-body restoration activities being undertaken without the requisite environmental permits across Ghana.

In a public notice issued on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, the Authority warned that institutions, companies, contractors and individuals operating without its approval must cease work immediately and report to the nearest EPA regional office or its head office for regulatory assessment.

The directive applies to both public and private projects, including government-sponsored, privately funded and donor-supported initiatives. The EPA specifically mentioned the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources, Forestry Commission, Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Minerals Commission and Mineral Development Fund among the institutions required to ensure compliance.

Under Regulation 40 of the Environmental Protection (Environmental Assessment) Regulations, 2025 (L.I. 2504), reclamation and restoration activities fall within Ghana’s environmental assessment and permitting framework.

The covered activities include rehabilitating abandoned mining sites, backfilling excavated areas, restoring degraded land, revegetation, dredging and desilting rivers, modifying river channels and restoring polluted water bodies, wetlands and aquatic ecosystems.

The Authority stressed that securing a contract, obtaining funding approval, holding a mining lease or receiving authorisation from another public institution does not replace an EPA Environmental Permit. Similarly, consent from traditional authorities, memoranda of understanding and participation in government programmes cannot substitute for the required approval.

Contracting institutions have also been directed to verify the environmental permit status of projects before allowing contractors to mobilise to their sites.

The EPA acknowledged the importance of restoring lands and water bodies damaged by illegal and irresponsible mining but cautioned that rehabilitation efforts must not create further environmental destruction by bypassing regulatory safeguards.

It warned that individuals and institutions that continue unapproved operations after the notice would face action in accordance with applicable Ghanaian laws.

The directive reinforces the Authority’s position that environmental restoration, regardless of its funding source or purpose, must comply with the country’s permitting requirements.

Continue Reading

General News

North Korea and China Open Long-Delayed Bridge

Published

on

The opening of the long-awaited New Yalu River Bridge marks a significant step towards strengthening cross-border transport and trade between China and North Korea.

China and North Korea have officially opened a major bridge linking the two countries, ending a 12-year delay that kept the infrastructure project unused despite its completion in 2014.

The New Yalu River Bridge connects the Chinese border city of Dandong, in Liaoning province, with Sinuiju in North Korea. The four-lane crossing stretches approximately three kilometres across the Yalu River and is expected to improve the movement of goods between the neighbouring countries.

The project was originally intended to begin operating in 2014. However, the opening was postponed for years as infrastructure on the North Korean side, including connecting roads and customs facilities, remained incomplete. Analysts have also pointed to strained bilateral relations and disagreements surrounding economic cooperation as possible contributing factors.

Trade and economic implications

The new crossing is expected to ease pressure on the older China–North Korea Friendship Bridge, which has served as a major route for official trade between the two countries.

By providing additional road capacity, the new bridge could improve freight transportation, reduce congestion and support the movement of essential goods. Its strategic location is particularly important because China remains North Korea’s principal trading partner.

Nevertheless, the opening does not automatically guarantee a rapid increase in trade. International sanctions imposed in response to North Korea’s nuclear and weapons programmes continue to constrain economic activity, while the scale of future commercial traffic will depend on border arrangements and the two governments’ economic policies.

A signal of closer bilateral engagement

The bridge’s inauguration comes amid renewed diplomatic engagement between Beijing and Pyongyang. It also highlights China’s continued economic importance to North Korea as the latter seeks to maintain relationships with key regional partners.

For China, improved transport links could facilitate cross-border commerce and support economic activity in Dandong. For North Korea, the bridge offers additional capacity for importing goods and developing commercial infrastructure around Sinuiju.

However, the project’s long delay illustrates how political disagreements and economic considerations can obstruct infrastructure intended to improve regional connectivity.

What happens next?

Attention will now turn to how quickly the bridge becomes an established route for commercial traffic and whether the additional capacity translates into measurable growth in bilateral trade.

While the opening represents an important infrastructure milestone, its longer-term economic and diplomatic impact will depend on the willingness of both governments to sustain cooperation and the restrictions governing North Korea’s international trade.

The opening ends a lengthy wait for the two countries, but the bridge’s ultimate significance will be measured by the trade and cooperation it enables in the years ahead.

Continue Reading

Trending