General News
Concerned Group of Ghana Warns Nigeria Over Alleged Xenophobic Attacks on Jonah Capital, Cautions Against Threat to Ghana-Nigeria Relations
The Concerned Group of Ghana (CGG) has strongly condemned what it describes as a sustained campaign of xenophobic attacks against Ghanaian-owned Jonah Capital and its flagship investment, River Park Estate, in Abuja, Nigeria, warning that the actions of Nigerian authorities could undermine regional integration and strain the longstanding relationship between Ghana and Nigeria.

Addressing a press conference in Accra, the Convener of the group, Mr. James Clarke, said the treatment being meted out to Jonah Capital amounts to targeted hostility against a legitimate Ghanaian investment operating in Nigeria.

The group’s reaction follows events that unfolded on July 10, 2026, when the National Association of Ghanaian Communities in Nigeria (NAGHACON) held a press conference at River Park Estate in Abuja.
According to NAGHACON, staff, management and assets of Jonah Capital came under what it described as coordinated attacks by Nigerian state actors following the purported revocation of the company’s Development Lease Agreement and the forceful takeover of portions of its land under the authority of the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Mr. Nyesom Wike.

Mr. Clarke said such actions represent clear intimidation of a Ghanaian-owned business and should be condemned by all advocates of justice, investment protection and regional cooperation.
Group Accuses Nigerian Police of Ignoring Own Investigation
The Concerned Group of Ghana also accused the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) of Nigeria, Mr. Kayode Egbetokun, of disregarding the findings of the Police’s own Special Investigation Panel in the long-running dispute involving Jonah Capital.
According to Mr. Clarke, despite the Special Investigation Panel’s conclusions, the Office of the Inspector-General proceeded to prosecute officials of Jonah Capital on allegations of forgery and related offences in Charge No. CR/402/25.

However, he said an independent review conducted by the Attorney-General of the Federal Republic of Nigeria completely overturned the basis of those prosecutions.
The group disclosed that it possesses certified copies of a letter dated December 30, 2025 (Reference: DPPA/REQ/224/25) from the Attorney-General’s office, which made several key findings.

Among them were:
- No prima facie case of forgery or any related criminal offence had been established against Sir Samuel Esson Jonah, Mr. Kojo Ansah Mensah, Mr. Victor Quainoo, and Mr. Abu Arome.
- The report of the Nigeria Police Special Investigation Panel dated March 28, 2025, was valid, comprehensive and unbiased, and was therefore affirmed.
- The Attorney-General found that the findings of the Police IGP Monitoring Unit were highly misleading because they failed to satisfy the legal burden of proof required for criminal prosecution and improperly attempted to criminalise what was essentially a commercial dispute involving ownership, shareholding and contractual obligations.
- The Attorney-General further ruled that the Nigeria Police acted beyond its legal mandate when it publicly declared certain private individuals as the rightful owners and managers of River Park Estate without any judicial determination, stressing that the police have no authority to determine land ownership or contractual rights.
- The Attorney-General also directed the Nigeria Police Force to investigate allegations of destruction of property, criminal intimidation and assaults against staff, agents, customers and residents of River Park Estate while ensuring peace and security within the estate.
Criminal Charges Dismissed
Mr. Clarke noted that following the Attorney-General’s legal opinion, the criminal case against Jonah Capital’s officials was terminated.
He said on January 20, 2026, the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory struck out the charges in Suit No. FCT/JD/HC/CR/402/2025, adding that the Concerned Group also possesses certified records confirming the court’s decision.
Questions Fresh Government Action
The group questioned why, despite the Attorney-General’s findings and the dismissal of the criminal case, Jonah Capital continues to face actions from another arm of the Nigerian government.
Mr. Clarke said it was difficult to understand why the FCT Administration had chosen to move against the company while issues relating to the Development Lease Agreement remain the subject of ongoing international arbitration.
According to him, although the FCT Minister claims the agreement has expired, Jonah Capital disputes that position and has challenged it before an international arbitral tribunal.
He argued that rather than allowing the legal process to determine the matter, authorities allegedly entered the company’s property with armed personnel, damaged company assets, including parts of the Gallery Clubhouse, and endangered the lives of workers.
“Let us be clear: whether or not the agreement has expired is precisely the question now pending before arbitrators. No party that is confident of its case needs bulldozers and armed men to make its argument,” Mr. Clarke stated.
Raises Concerns Over Previous Actions
The Concerned Group further alleged that Jonah Capital has previously been subjected to other actions by Nigerian institutions.
Mr. Clarke referred to what he described as the unilateral alteration of the company’s shareholding records at Nigeria’s Corporate Affairs Commission under Registrar-General Mr. Hussaini Magaji.
According to him, Nigeria’s National Assembly later intervened and ordered the restoration of the original directors and shareholders.
He also cited the detention of one of the company’s executives by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over the same forgery allegations that were later dismissed by the Attorney-General as lacking legal foundation.
Warns Against Undermining AfCFTA
The Concerned Group argued that the treatment of Jonah Capital undermines the objectives of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and contradicts efforts aimed at strengthening regional economic integration across Africa.
The group described the actions as anti-investment, anti-regional cooperation and inconsistent with the spirit of free trade and cross-border investment promotion.
Petition to Nigerian High Commission
Mr. Clarke disclosed that the Concerned Group has already petitioned the Nigerian High Commissioner to Ghana over the matter.
The group urged Nigerian authorities to immediately halt what it described as persistent harassment and xenophobic attacks against the Ghanaian company.
It warned that continued actions against Ghanaian businesses operating in Nigeria could provoke retaliatory sentiments against Nigerian businesses operating peacefully in Ghana, including UBA, Zenith Bank and Access Bank, all of which, according to the group, conduct successful business activities in Ghana without harassment.
Ghana’s Response in 2020 Cited
To illustrate what it described as Ghana’s commitment to good neighbourliness, the group recalled the June 2020 demolition of a building on the premises of the Nigerian High Commission in Accra by a private developer.
Mr. Clarke noted that Ghanaians widely condemned the incident, the individual responsible was arrested and prosecuted, and the Government of Ghana undertook the reconstruction of the demolished structure.
He said that response demonstrated Ghana’s respect for diplomatic relations and foreign investments.
“It is therefore painful that the only prominent Ghanaian company in Abuja has suffered such consistent attacks—even in matters pending before courts and arbitrators—while we stand by seemingly unconcerned,” Mr. Clarke lamented.
The Concerned Group of Ghana called on the Nigerian government to respect the rule of law, protect legitimate foreign investments and ensure that the ongoing dispute involving Jonah Capital is resolved through lawful judicial and arbitral processes rather than force.
Source:senaradioonline.com
General News
GTA Regional Directors Raise Concerns Over CEO Maame Efua Houadjeto’s Leadership
Fourteen Regional Directors of the Ghana Tourism Authority (GTA) have raised concerns about the leadership approach of the Authority’s Chief Executive Officer, Maame Efua Houadjeto, during a meeting with the Board of Directors to address what they describe as persistent organisational challenges.
The meeting, held on Monday, October 12, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., was convened to discuss issues the Regional Directors say have remained unresolved since July 2026.
According to the Directors, the engagement was not intended to serve as an arbitration process but rather to obtain responses to questions and concerns they had previously raised.
During the meeting, the Directors expressed their displeasure with the CEO’s leadership approach, highlighting concerns about stakeholder engagement, regional coordination and other issues they believe are affecting the effective operation of the Authority.
They indicated that the concerns extend beyond individual disagreements and touch on broader institutional matters that require attention to ensure the smooth functioning of the GTA.
The Directors maintained that their position was motivated by the need to safeguard the integrity of the institution and restore effective operations across its regional structures.
They also called on the Board of Directors to facilitate a formal response from the Office of the CEO to the issues raised, stressing the need for the concerns to be addressed through the appropriate institutional channels.
The engagement provided an opportunity for the Regional Directors to formally communicate their grievances to the Board and seek its intervention in resolving the outstanding matters.
The meeting ended with a call for further intervention by the Board of Directors to ensure that the issues raised receive the necessary attention and responses.
It remains unclear what specific questions have been pending since July, what responses the Regional Directors expect from the CEO, or what steps the Board intends to take following the meeting.
The outcome of any subsequent engagement between the Board, the CEO and the Regional Directors is expected to be important in determining how the concerns will be addressed and how coordination within the Authority will be strengthened.
General News
Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, Son of Ghana’s First President, Dies in Cairo
Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, son of Ghana’s founding President, Osagyefo Dr Kwame Nkrumah, has died in Cairo, Egypt, following a prolonged illness.
The Nkrumah family announced his death in a statement posted on the Facebook page of Samia Nkrumah, daughter of Ghana’s first president.
According to the statement, Gamal passed away peacefully in Cairo, where he had been receiving care at a rehabilitation centre after suffering a stroke.
The family described him as a beloved son, respected journalist, writer and intellectual who dedicated much of his life to examining the political, social and cultural developments shaping Africa and the wider world.
It said Gamal remained deeply committed to the ideals of justice, human dignity, African unity and international solidarity throughout his life.
As a journalist and commentator, he used his voice and intellect to analyse issues affecting Africa and the international community, earning recognition among friends, colleagues and readers who valued his insights and perspectives.
The family further described him as a man of profound intellectual curiosity, independent thought and quiet conviction, noting that he carried forward his father’s legacy in his own distinctive way while building a reputation based on his personal principles and achievements.
His death, the family said, represents a significant loss not only to his relatives and loved ones but also to the wider community of people who appreciated his work, humanity and engagement with important issues of his time.
The statement added that the family remembers Gamal with immense love, gratitude and pride, describing his wisdom, kindness and commitment to his values as an enduring source of inspiration.
The Nkrumah family also expressed appreciation to those who supported Gamal throughout his illness, particularly the medical professionals and caregivers in Cairo who provided him with treatment and care.
It extended its gratitude to the governments and people of both Egypt and Ghana for their support during the difficult period.
The family has appealed to the public to respect its privacy as it mourns the loss.
Details of memorial arrangements and opportunities for the public to pay tribute to Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah’s life and legacy, according to the statement, will be communicated in due course.
General News
FOUR PROFESSORS SUE TO HALT GIMPA RECTOR SEARCH PROCESS AMID CONTROVERSY
Four professors at the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) have filed a lawsuit seeking to halt aspects of the process to select a search committee for the appointment of a new Rector, escalating tensions over the institution’s leadership transition.
The plaintiffs are Professors Lord Mawuko Yevugah, Wisdom Akpalu, Kwami Adanu and Patrick Tandoh-Offin. They filed the action on October 5, 2026, challenging aspects of the process involving the Chairman of GIMPA’s Governing Council, the Institute’s Secretary and the Rector.
At the centre of the dispute is the Convocation register used to determine who could vote for representatives on the Rector Search Committee. The professors contend that about 30 newly appointed or promoted lecturers were included on the register despite questions over whether their appointments had received the necessary approval from the Governing Council.
They argue that allowing the lecturers to participate in the election could undermine the legitimacy of the process and have asked the court to ensure that the selection of the search committee complies with GIMPA’s 2020 Statutes. They also want the committee’s composition and the respective roles of the Governing Council and Convocation clarified.
GIMPA management, however, has indicated that a special ad hoc committee audited the Convocation register and confirmed that those listed had valid appointments, based on Human Resource Management records. Exceptions reportedly applied to staff on leave of absence or secondment.
The Convocation election proceeded on October 6. According to reports, Professor Patrick Tandoh-Offin contested to represent the professorial class but lost to Professor Emmanuel Gyamfi Numapau, who received 118 votes against Tandoh-Offin’s 35.
The legal challenge comes as GIMPA prepares for the end of Rector Professor Samuel Kwaku Bonsu’s tenure in August 2027. The Institute’s statutes require the search process to begin ahead of the incumbent’s departure.
The case raises questions about voting eligibility, institutional governance and the procedures for selecting the next Rector. The court’s determination could affect the process, although the available reports do not establish that an injunction has been granted or that the election
General News
EPA ORDERS IMMEDIATE HALT TO UNAPPROVED RECLAMATION WORKS NATIONWIDE — GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, CONTRACTORS ON NOTICE
The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has ordered an immediate halt to all land reclamation, mine-site rehabilitation, dredging and water-body restoration activities being undertaken without the requisite environmental permits across Ghana.
In a public notice issued on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, the Authority warned that institutions, companies, contractors and individuals operating without its approval must cease work immediately and report to the nearest EPA regional office or its head office for regulatory assessment.
The directive applies to both public and private projects, including government-sponsored, privately funded and donor-supported initiatives. The EPA specifically mentioned the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources, Forestry Commission, Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Minerals Commission and Mineral Development Fund among the institutions required to ensure compliance.
Under Regulation 40 of the Environmental Protection (Environmental Assessment) Regulations, 2025 (L.I. 2504), reclamation and restoration activities fall within Ghana’s environmental assessment and permitting framework.
The covered activities include rehabilitating abandoned mining sites, backfilling excavated areas, restoring degraded land, revegetation, dredging and desilting rivers, modifying river channels and restoring polluted water bodies, wetlands and aquatic ecosystems.
The Authority stressed that securing a contract, obtaining funding approval, holding a mining lease or receiving authorisation from another public institution does not replace an EPA Environmental Permit. Similarly, consent from traditional authorities, memoranda of understanding and participation in government programmes cannot substitute for the required approval.
Contracting institutions have also been directed to verify the environmental permit status of projects before allowing contractors to mobilise to their sites.
The EPA acknowledged the importance of restoring lands and water bodies damaged by illegal and irresponsible mining but cautioned that rehabilitation efforts must not create further environmental destruction by bypassing regulatory safeguards.
It warned that individuals and institutions that continue unapproved operations after the notice would face action in accordance with applicable Ghanaian laws.
The directive reinforces the Authority’s position that environmental restoration, regardless of its funding source or purpose, must comply with the country’s permitting requirements.
General News
North Korea and China Open Long-Delayed Bridge
The opening of the long-awaited New Yalu River Bridge marks a significant step towards strengthening cross-border transport and trade between China and North Korea.
China and North Korea have officially opened a major bridge linking the two countries, ending a 12-year delay that kept the infrastructure project unused despite its completion in 2014.
The New Yalu River Bridge connects the Chinese border city of Dandong, in Liaoning province, with Sinuiju in North Korea. The four-lane crossing stretches approximately three kilometres across the Yalu River and is expected to improve the movement of goods between the neighbouring countries.
The project was originally intended to begin operating in 2014. However, the opening was postponed for years as infrastructure on the North Korean side, including connecting roads and customs facilities, remained incomplete. Analysts have also pointed to strained bilateral relations and disagreements surrounding economic cooperation as possible contributing factors.
Trade and economic implications
The new crossing is expected to ease pressure on the older China–North Korea Friendship Bridge, which has served as a major route for official trade between the two countries.
By providing additional road capacity, the new bridge could improve freight transportation, reduce congestion and support the movement of essential goods. Its strategic location is particularly important because China remains North Korea’s principal trading partner.
Nevertheless, the opening does not automatically guarantee a rapid increase in trade. International sanctions imposed in response to North Korea’s nuclear and weapons programmes continue to constrain economic activity, while the scale of future commercial traffic will depend on border arrangements and the two governments’ economic policies.
A signal of closer bilateral engagement
The bridge’s inauguration comes amid renewed diplomatic engagement between Beijing and Pyongyang. It also highlights China’s continued economic importance to North Korea as the latter seeks to maintain relationships with key regional partners.
For China, improved transport links could facilitate cross-border commerce and support economic activity in Dandong. For North Korea, the bridge offers additional capacity for importing goods and developing commercial infrastructure around Sinuiju.
However, the project’s long delay illustrates how political disagreements and economic considerations can obstruct infrastructure intended to improve regional connectivity.
What happens next?
Attention will now turn to how quickly the bridge becomes an established route for commercial traffic and whether the additional capacity translates into measurable growth in bilateral trade.
While the opening represents an important infrastructure milestone, its longer-term economic and diplomatic impact will depend on the willingness of both governments to sustain cooperation and the restrictions governing North Korea’s international trade.
The opening ends a lengthy wait for the two countries, but the bridge’s ultimate significance will be measured by the trade and cooperation it enables in the years ahead.
-
Politics2 weeks agoAsiedu Nketiah to Chair Launch of Six NDC Historiographies on Ghana’s Political Journey
-
General News1 week agoWorld Cup Visa Storm: Kojo’s GTA Questions Resurface as Minority Demands Action
-
General News2 weeks agoSSNIT Unveils Big Plans to Transform Labadi, La Palm Beachfront into Tourism Hub
-
General News1 week agoPolitical communicators must prepare before speaking on teachers’ strike – Seth Afum Dankwah
-
Education2 weeks agoShould Schools Teach Students How to Handle Failure?
-
General News2 weeks agoUniversity of Ghana Announces Major Update on 2026/2027 Registration and Accommodation
-
Politics2 weeks agoGhana ‘Sitting on a Time Bomb’ Over Narcotics Trade — Peter Wonder Warns
-
General News1 week agoPolice Investigate Death of Three Children at Kobilmahigu; IGP Deploys Special Team
