Connect with us

General News

Ethiopia’s Tigray Crisis Deepens as Rival Claims Raise Fears of Renewed Conflict

Published

on

By Angel No Lie | KPD Online | September 24, 2026

ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia — Tensions between Ethiopia’s federal government and authorities in the northern Tigray region have escalated, with both sides accusing the other of initiating military action and raising concerns that the country could return to large-scale conflict.

The latest confrontation comes nearly four years after the November 2022 peace agreement that brought an end to the devastating Tigray war. Reports of territorial seizures, drone strikes and the formation of a new alliance of armed opposition groups have added to concerns about the durability of the peace settlement.

Survivors | World Press Photo

Survivors | World Press Photo

Federal government and Tigrayan authorities exchange accusations

Getachew Reda, an adviser to Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, accused Tigrayan forces of taking control of federally administered airports in the region and launching attacks in neighboring Afar and Amhara.

Tigrayan authorities have rejected the characterization of their actions as an offensive, saying their forces were pushed into a defensive conflict following reported drone attacks in Tigray.

The conflicting accounts have not all been independently verified, and the parties’ descriptions of who initiated the latest military activity remain disputed.

Etiopía anuncia su ofensiva final sobre la capital de la región rebelde de Tigray | Internacional | EL PAÍS

Etiopía anuncia su ofensiva final sobre la capital de la región rebelde de Tigray | Internacional | EL PAÍS

Reported drone strikes in Alamata

Tigrayan authorities said that a drone and air attack on the town of Alamata in southern Tigray killed at least 14 people and injured 22 others. According to the local mayor, the reported attacks affected civilian areas, including two high schools.

The BBC reported that it could not independently verify the claims, while the Ethiopian federal government had not publicly commented on the alleged attacks at the time of the report.

The allegations are significant because attacks on civilian areas could further undermine efforts to maintain the 2022 peace agreement and increase displacement risks.

Aid Distribution And Rebuilding In Tigray

Aid Distribution And Rebuilding In Tigray

Airport control disrupts travel

The reported change in control of airports in Tigray led Ethiopian Airlines to cancel flights to the region, according to reports.

Residents in Mekelle told the BBC that local forces had taken control of the city’s airport from national police in the early hours of Wednesday. The airport developments underline how military and political tensions can quickly affect civilian movement, transportation and access to essential services.

New opposition alliance increases political pressure

The latest tensions follow the announcement of the Ethiopian Peoples’ Forces Alliance for Survival, a coalition of seven armed opposition groups seeking to remove Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s government.

The alliance includes the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), the Amhara Fano National Movement and groups associated with Oromia, Afar, Somali, Benishangul-Gumuz and other areas.

The coalition brings together groups with different regional interests and histories. The TPLF and Fano forces, for example, previously fought on opposing sides during the 2020–2022 Tigray war. The coalition’s leaders have accused the federal government of centralizing power and marginalizing regional communities.

Questions about the alliance’s capacity

The formation of the alliance represents an additional political and security challenge for Addis Ababa. However, analysts have questioned whether the groups can coordinate effectively because of their geographic separation, differing political objectives and uneven military capabilities.

Magnus Taylor of the International Crisis Group told Reuters that cooperation could be constrained by the groups’ internal weaknesses and political differences. The alliance’s announcement, therefore, does not by itself establish that the groups can operate as a unified military force.

The unresolved legacy of the 2022 peace agreement

The Tigray war, which began in 2020, caused extensive civilian suffering, displacement and destruction. The Pretoria agreement signed in November 2022 ended the main phase of the conflict, but several contentious issues have remained unresolved.

These include territorial disputes, the status of regional political institutions, the future of armed forces in Tigray and relations between the federal government and regional authorities.

Reuters reported that the TPLF reasserted control over Tigray’s political administration in May 2026, an action described as violating the 2022 agreement. Tigrayan authorities, however, have accused the federal government of failing to implement the peace deal fully.

Regional and international concerns

The renewed tension has implications beyond Tigray. The region borders areas including Amhara and Afar, where separate political and armed conflicts have also contributed to insecurity.

Ethiopia’s relationship with neighboring Eritrea is another factor. The federal government has accused Eritrea of supporting armed opposition groups involved in the new alliance. Eritrea has repeatedly denied similar allegations. The role of external actors remains contested and requires independent verification.

The African Union Commission chairperson, Mahmoud Ali Youssouf, has called for immediate de-escalation and a return to negotiations. The appeal reflects concern that continued military escalation could undermine the peace process and worsen the humanitarian situation.

Humanitarian risks

A return to sustained fighting could place additional pressure on communities that have not fully recovered from the previous war.

Potential consequences include:

  • Displacement: Civilians may be forced to leave areas affected by fighting or airstrikes.

  • Disrupted services: Damage to airports, roads, schools and health facilities could restrict access to essential services.

  • Food insecurity: Conflict-related restrictions on movement and supply routes could affect food distribution.

  • Civilian protection concerns: Allegations of attacks in populated areas require investigation and appropriate accountability mechanisms.

The extent of any new humanitarian emergency remains uncertain, and available reports do not establish the full scale of current displacement or casualties.

What happens next?

The immediate priority identified by regional and international officials is to prevent the current confrontation from developing into a wider war.

The main issues to monitor include:

Issue

Why it matters

Control of airports and territory

Could affect civilian movement and indicate changes in military control

Alleged drone strikes

Raises concerns about civilian safety and escalation

Implementation of the 2022 peace deal

Determines whether existing political and security arrangements remain viable

Armed opposition alliance

Could increase pressure on the federal government if coordination improves

Ethiopia–Eritrea relations

Alleged external support could widen the regional dimension of the crisis

Independent assessment

The latest developments show a serious deterioration in relations between Ethiopia’s federal authorities and Tigrayan leaders. However, the competing claims about who initiated the latest offensive should not be treated as independently established facts.

The formation of a broader opposition coalition and the reported military incidents increase the risks surrounding the peace process, but they do not necessarily establish that a full-scale war has begun. Independent monitoring, humanitarian access, verified casualty reporting and renewed negotiations will be important in determining whether the current crisis can be contained.

The central question is whether Ethiopia’s political actors can prevent localized military confrontations from developing into a wider national conflict.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

General News

GTA Regional Directors Raise Concerns Over CEO Maame Efua Houadjeto’s Leadership

Published

on

Fourteen Regional Directors of the Ghana Tourism Authority (GTA) have raised concerns about the leadership approach of the Authority’s Chief Executive Officer, Maame Efua Houadjeto, during a meeting with the Board of Directors to address what they describe as persistent organisational challenges.

The meeting, held on Monday, October 12, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., was convened to discuss issues the Regional Directors say have remained unresolved since July 2026.

According to the Directors, the engagement was not intended to serve as an arbitration process but rather to obtain responses to questions and concerns they had previously raised.

During the meeting, the Directors expressed their displeasure with the CEO’s leadership approach, highlighting concerns about stakeholder engagement, regional coordination and other issues they believe are affecting the effective operation of the Authority.

They indicated that the concerns extend beyond individual disagreements and touch on broader institutional matters that require attention to ensure the smooth functioning of the GTA.

The Directors maintained that their position was motivated by the need to safeguard the integrity of the institution and restore effective operations across its regional structures.

They also called on the Board of Directors to facilitate a formal response from the Office of the CEO to the issues raised, stressing the need for the concerns to be addressed through the appropriate institutional channels.

The engagement provided an opportunity for the Regional Directors to formally communicate their grievances to the Board and seek its intervention in resolving the outstanding matters.

The meeting ended with a call for further intervention by the Board of Directors to ensure that the issues raised receive the necessary attention and responses.

It remains unclear what specific questions have been pending since July, what responses the Regional Directors expect from the CEO, or what steps the Board intends to take following the meeting.

The outcome of any subsequent engagement between the Board, the CEO and the Regional Directors is expected to be important in determining how the concerns will be addressed and how coordination within the Authority will be strengthened.

Continue Reading

General News

Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, Son of Ghana’s First President, Dies in Cairo

Published

on

Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, son of Ghana’s founding President, Osagyefo Dr Kwame Nkrumah, has died in Cairo, Egypt, following a prolonged illness.

The Nkrumah family announced his death in a statement posted on the Facebook page of Samia Nkrumah, daughter of Ghana’s first president.

According to the statement, Gamal passed away peacefully in Cairo, where he had been receiving care at a rehabilitation centre after suffering a stroke.

The family described him as a beloved son, respected journalist, writer and intellectual who dedicated much of his life to examining the political, social and cultural developments shaping Africa and the wider world.

It said Gamal remained deeply committed to the ideals of justice, human dignity, African unity and international solidarity throughout his life.

As a journalist and commentator, he used his voice and intellect to analyse issues affecting Africa and the international community, earning recognition among friends, colleagues and readers who valued his insights and perspectives.

The family further described him as a man of profound intellectual curiosity, independent thought and quiet conviction, noting that he carried forward his father’s legacy in his own distinctive way while building a reputation based on his personal principles and achievements.

His death, the family said, represents a significant loss not only to his relatives and loved ones but also to the wider community of people who appreciated his work, humanity and engagement with important issues of his time.

The statement added that the family remembers Gamal with immense love, gratitude and pride, describing his wisdom, kindness and commitment to his values as an enduring source of inspiration.

The Nkrumah family also expressed appreciation to those who supported Gamal throughout his illness, particularly the medical professionals and caregivers in Cairo who provided him with treatment and care.

It extended its gratitude to the governments and people of both Egypt and Ghana for their support during the difficult period.

The family has appealed to the public to respect its privacy as it mourns the loss.

Details of memorial arrangements and opportunities for the public to pay tribute to Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah’s life and legacy, according to the statement, will be communicated in due course.

https://web.facebook.com/share/p/1DTR2Ht1fH/

Continue Reading

General News

FOUR PROFESSORS SUE TO HALT GIMPA RECTOR SEARCH PROCESS AMID CONTROVERSY

Published

on

Four professors at the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) have filed a lawsuit seeking to halt aspects of the process to select a search committee for the appointment of a new Rector, escalating tensions over the institution’s leadership transition.

The plaintiffs are Professors Lord Mawuko Yevugah, Wisdom Akpalu, Kwami Adanu and Patrick Tandoh-Offin. They filed the action on October 5, 2026, challenging aspects of the process involving the Chairman of GIMPA’s Governing Council, the Institute’s Secretary and the Rector.

At the centre of the dispute is the Convocation register used to determine who could vote for representatives on the Rector Search Committee. The professors contend that about 30 newly appointed or promoted lecturers were included on the register despite questions over whether their appointments had received the necessary approval from the Governing Council.

They argue that allowing the lecturers to participate in the election could undermine the legitimacy of the process and have asked the court to ensure that the selection of the search committee complies with GIMPA’s 2020 Statutes. They also want the committee’s composition and the respective roles of the Governing Council and Convocation clarified.

GIMPA management, however, has indicated that a special ad hoc committee audited the Convocation register and confirmed that those listed had valid appointments, based on Human Resource Management records. Exceptions reportedly applied to staff on leave of absence or secondment.

The Convocation election proceeded on October 6. According to reports, Professor Patrick Tandoh-Offin contested to represent the professorial class but lost to Professor Emmanuel Gyamfi Numapau, who received 118 votes against Tandoh-Offin’s 35.

The legal challenge comes as GIMPA prepares for the end of Rector Professor Samuel Kwaku Bonsu’s tenure in August 2027. The Institute’s statutes require the search process to begin ahead of the incumbent’s departure.

The case raises questions about voting eligibility, institutional governance and the procedures for selecting the next Rector. The court’s determination could affect the process, although the available reports do not establish that an injunction has been granted or that the election

Continue Reading

General News

EPA ORDERS IMMEDIATE HALT TO UNAPPROVED RECLAMATION WORKS NATIONWIDE — GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, CONTRACTORS ON NOTICE

Published

on

The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has ordered an immediate halt to all land reclamation, mine-site rehabilitation, dredging and water-body restoration activities being undertaken without the requisite environmental permits across Ghana.

In a public notice issued on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, the Authority warned that institutions, companies, contractors and individuals operating without its approval must cease work immediately and report to the nearest EPA regional office or its head office for regulatory assessment.

The directive applies to both public and private projects, including government-sponsored, privately funded and donor-supported initiatives. The EPA specifically mentioned the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources, Forestry Commission, Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Minerals Commission and Mineral Development Fund among the institutions required to ensure compliance.

Under Regulation 40 of the Environmental Protection (Environmental Assessment) Regulations, 2025 (L.I. 2504), reclamation and restoration activities fall within Ghana’s environmental assessment and permitting framework.

The covered activities include rehabilitating abandoned mining sites, backfilling excavated areas, restoring degraded land, revegetation, dredging and desilting rivers, modifying river channels and restoring polluted water bodies, wetlands and aquatic ecosystems.

The Authority stressed that securing a contract, obtaining funding approval, holding a mining lease or receiving authorisation from another public institution does not replace an EPA Environmental Permit. Similarly, consent from traditional authorities, memoranda of understanding and participation in government programmes cannot substitute for the required approval.

Contracting institutions have also been directed to verify the environmental permit status of projects before allowing contractors to mobilise to their sites.

The EPA acknowledged the importance of restoring lands and water bodies damaged by illegal and irresponsible mining but cautioned that rehabilitation efforts must not create further environmental destruction by bypassing regulatory safeguards.

It warned that individuals and institutions that continue unapproved operations after the notice would face action in accordance with applicable Ghanaian laws.

The directive reinforces the Authority’s position that environmental restoration, regardless of its funding source or purpose, must comply with the country’s permitting requirements.

Continue Reading

General News

North Korea and China Open Long-Delayed Bridge

Published

on

The opening of the long-awaited New Yalu River Bridge marks a significant step towards strengthening cross-border transport and trade between China and North Korea.

China and North Korea have officially opened a major bridge linking the two countries, ending a 12-year delay that kept the infrastructure project unused despite its completion in 2014.

The New Yalu River Bridge connects the Chinese border city of Dandong, in Liaoning province, with Sinuiju in North Korea. The four-lane crossing stretches approximately three kilometres across the Yalu River and is expected to improve the movement of goods between the neighbouring countries.

The project was originally intended to begin operating in 2014. However, the opening was postponed for years as infrastructure on the North Korean side, including connecting roads and customs facilities, remained incomplete. Analysts have also pointed to strained bilateral relations and disagreements surrounding economic cooperation as possible contributing factors.

Trade and economic implications

The new crossing is expected to ease pressure on the older China–North Korea Friendship Bridge, which has served as a major route for official trade between the two countries.

By providing additional road capacity, the new bridge could improve freight transportation, reduce congestion and support the movement of essential goods. Its strategic location is particularly important because China remains North Korea’s principal trading partner.

Nevertheless, the opening does not automatically guarantee a rapid increase in trade. International sanctions imposed in response to North Korea’s nuclear and weapons programmes continue to constrain economic activity, while the scale of future commercial traffic will depend on border arrangements and the two governments’ economic policies.

A signal of closer bilateral engagement

The bridge’s inauguration comes amid renewed diplomatic engagement between Beijing and Pyongyang. It also highlights China’s continued economic importance to North Korea as the latter seeks to maintain relationships with key regional partners.

For China, improved transport links could facilitate cross-border commerce and support economic activity in Dandong. For North Korea, the bridge offers additional capacity for importing goods and developing commercial infrastructure around Sinuiju.

However, the project’s long delay illustrates how political disagreements and economic considerations can obstruct infrastructure intended to improve regional connectivity.

What happens next?

Attention will now turn to how quickly the bridge becomes an established route for commercial traffic and whether the additional capacity translates into measurable growth in bilateral trade.

While the opening represents an important infrastructure milestone, its longer-term economic and diplomatic impact will depend on the willingness of both governments to sustain cooperation and the restrictions governing North Korea’s international trade.

The opening ends a lengthy wait for the two countries, but the bridge’s ultimate significance will be measured by the trade and cooperation it enables in the years ahead.

Continue Reading

Trending