Connect with us

General News

Iran War Reshapes BRICS Ties but Also Exposes Divisions

Published

on

By Angel No Lie | KPD Online | September 13, 2026

The war involving Iran has become one of the most significant geopolitical tests for the BRICS grouping, strengthening ties between some of its members while exposing sharp differences over how far the bloc should go in confronting Western power.

The conflict has placed Iran — a relatively new BRICS member — at the center of discussions about the future direction of the expanded grouping. Russia and China have maintained close strategic relations with Tehran, while India has pursued a more cautious diplomatic position, seeking to preserve relationships with Iran, Russia, the United States and Europe simultaneously.

Those competing interests have made it difficult for BRICS to develop a single position on the war.

The divisions became particularly visible in May, when BRICS foreign ministers meeting in New Delhi failed to produce a joint statement amid disagreements over the conflict. Iran wanted the grouping to issue a stronger condemnation of the military action against it, while other members were reluctant to adopt language that could place them directly against Washington or its regional partners.

The situation is complicated further by the presence of Gulf countries inside the expanded BRICS framework. Iran and the United Arab Emirates have sharply different security interests, while Saudi Arabia has also maintained close relationships with the United States. That makes it difficult for BRICS to behave like a conventional political or military alliance.

Instead, the crisis has highlighted what BRICS actually is: a diverse coalition of countries seeking greater influence in a global system they believe remains dominated by Western institutions.

Iran finds greater strategic space

For Tehran, BRICS membership has taken on greater importance during the war.

Iran has sought diplomatic support from fellow members while facing pressure from the United States and its allies. Russia and China have emerged as particularly important partners, providing Tehran with political and economic relationships that help reduce its isolation.

The war has therefore accelerated a trend that was already underway: closer cooperation between Iran and some of the major powers inside BRICS.

But this does not mean that every BRICS country shares Iran’s strategic objectives.

India, for example, has emphasized dialogue and de-escalation rather than openly aligning itself with either side. Its position reflects a broader foreign-policy strategy designed to maintain partnerships across competing geopolitical camps.

That balancing act is increasingly important as New Delhi seeks to expand its influence across the Global South while maintaining economic and strategic relations with Western countries.

The September summit brings a different result

Despite the earlier divisions, BRICS leaders meeting in New Delhi in September managed to reach agreement on a joint declaration addressing the Middle East crisis.

The declaration called for maximum restraint and emphasized dialogue and diplomacy rather than escalation. The agreement was significant because Iran sits within the same organization as countries with very different relationships with Tehran, including the UAE.

The consensus demonstrated that BRICS can still find common ground even when its members disagree over the causes of a conflict or the appropriate response.

But the carefully negotiated language also revealed the limits of that unity.

Rather than transforming BRICS into a collective security organization, the declaration relied on broad principles such as sovereignty, diplomacy and opposition to unilateral measures. That approach allowed countries with conflicting interests to remain inside the same political framework.

A bloc caught between cooperation and confrontation

The Iran war has also intensified a larger debate about what BRICS wants to become.

China and Russia have promoted a stronger multipolar international system and greater independence from Western-led institutions. China has also pushed for deeper economic and technological cooperation within the expanded bloc, including work on supply chains, industrial cooperation, artificial intelligence and alternative financial mechanisms.

Other members, however, are more cautious about turning BRICS into an explicitly anti-Western organization.

India’s position is particularly important. New Delhi wants BRICS to strengthen the voice of developing countries and reform international institutions, but it has little interest in turning the group into another military or ideological alliance.

That difference could determine BRICS’ future.

If the organization becomes primarily a vehicle for opposing the United States and Europe, some members may become uncomfortable with its direction. If it remains focused on economic cooperation, development and reform of global institutions, it has a better chance of accommodating countries with competing foreign policies.

The real test is what comes next

The Iran war has therefore produced a paradox for BRICS.

On one hand, the conflict has strengthened relationships among countries seeking alternatives to Western economic and political dominance. It has increased the importance of Russia-China-Iran cooperation and given Tehran a wider diplomatic platform.

On the other hand, the war has demonstrated that BRICS members do not share a single worldview.

The grouping contains countries with competing regional interests, different relationships with Washington and different economic priorities. Its ability to reach consensus on Iran does not erase those differences.

The New Delhi summit may ultimately prove that BRICS does not need complete political unity to become more influential. Its strength could instead lie in its ability to keep countries with opposing interests at the same table.

But that model has limits.

As geopolitical crises multiply — from Iran and the wider Middle East to Ukraine and growing US-China competition — BRICS will increasingly be judged not by the size of its membership, but by whether it can translate its growing economic weight into effective diplomacy and practical cooperation.

The Iran war has shown that the bloc is becoming more important. It has also shown that becoming more important does not necessarily mean becoming more united.

For BRICS, that contradiction may define the next stage of its development.

General News

GTA Regional Directors Raise Concerns Over CEO Maame Efua Houadjeto’s Leadership

Published

on

Fourteen Regional Directors of the Ghana Tourism Authority (GTA) have raised concerns about the leadership approach of the Authority’s Chief Executive Officer, Maame Efua Houadjeto, during a meeting with the Board of Directors to address what they describe as persistent organisational challenges.

The meeting, held on Monday, October 12, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., was convened to discuss issues the Regional Directors say have remained unresolved since July 2026.

According to the Directors, the engagement was not intended to serve as an arbitration process but rather to obtain responses to questions and concerns they had previously raised.

During the meeting, the Directors expressed their displeasure with the CEO’s leadership approach, highlighting concerns about stakeholder engagement, regional coordination and other issues they believe are affecting the effective operation of the Authority.

They indicated that the concerns extend beyond individual disagreements and touch on broader institutional matters that require attention to ensure the smooth functioning of the GTA.

The Directors maintained that their position was motivated by the need to safeguard the integrity of the institution and restore effective operations across its regional structures.

They also called on the Board of Directors to facilitate a formal response from the Office of the CEO to the issues raised, stressing the need for the concerns to be addressed through the appropriate institutional channels.

The engagement provided an opportunity for the Regional Directors to formally communicate their grievances to the Board and seek its intervention in resolving the outstanding matters.

The meeting ended with a call for further intervention by the Board of Directors to ensure that the issues raised receive the necessary attention and responses.

It remains unclear what specific questions have been pending since July, what responses the Regional Directors expect from the CEO, or what steps the Board intends to take following the meeting.

The outcome of any subsequent engagement between the Board, the CEO and the Regional Directors is expected to be important in determining how the concerns will be addressed and how coordination within the Authority will be strengthened.

Continue Reading

General News

Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, Son of Ghana’s First President, Dies in Cairo

Published

on

Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, son of Ghana’s founding President, Osagyefo Dr Kwame Nkrumah, has died in Cairo, Egypt, following a prolonged illness.

The Nkrumah family announced his death in a statement posted on the Facebook page of Samia Nkrumah, daughter of Ghana’s first president.

According to the statement, Gamal passed away peacefully in Cairo, where he had been receiving care at a rehabilitation centre after suffering a stroke.

The family described him as a beloved son, respected journalist, writer and intellectual who dedicated much of his life to examining the political, social and cultural developments shaping Africa and the wider world.

It said Gamal remained deeply committed to the ideals of justice, human dignity, African unity and international solidarity throughout his life.

As a journalist and commentator, he used his voice and intellect to analyse issues affecting Africa and the international community, earning recognition among friends, colleagues and readers who valued his insights and perspectives.

The family further described him as a man of profound intellectual curiosity, independent thought and quiet conviction, noting that he carried forward his father’s legacy in his own distinctive way while building a reputation based on his personal principles and achievements.

His death, the family said, represents a significant loss not only to his relatives and loved ones but also to the wider community of people who appreciated his work, humanity and engagement with important issues of his time.

The statement added that the family remembers Gamal with immense love, gratitude and pride, describing his wisdom, kindness and commitment to his values as an enduring source of inspiration.

The Nkrumah family also expressed appreciation to those who supported Gamal throughout his illness, particularly the medical professionals and caregivers in Cairo who provided him with treatment and care.

It extended its gratitude to the governments and people of both Egypt and Ghana for their support during the difficult period.

The family has appealed to the public to respect its privacy as it mourns the loss.

Details of memorial arrangements and opportunities for the public to pay tribute to Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah’s life and legacy, according to the statement, will be communicated in due course.

https://web.facebook.com/share/p/1DTR2Ht1fH/

Continue Reading

General News

FOUR PROFESSORS SUE TO HALT GIMPA RECTOR SEARCH PROCESS AMID CONTROVERSY

Published

on

Four professors at the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) have filed a lawsuit seeking to halt aspects of the process to select a search committee for the appointment of a new Rector, escalating tensions over the institution’s leadership transition.

The plaintiffs are Professors Lord Mawuko Yevugah, Wisdom Akpalu, Kwami Adanu and Patrick Tandoh-Offin. They filed the action on October 5, 2026, challenging aspects of the process involving the Chairman of GIMPA’s Governing Council, the Institute’s Secretary and the Rector.

At the centre of the dispute is the Convocation register used to determine who could vote for representatives on the Rector Search Committee. The professors contend that about 30 newly appointed or promoted lecturers were included on the register despite questions over whether their appointments had received the necessary approval from the Governing Council.

They argue that allowing the lecturers to participate in the election could undermine the legitimacy of the process and have asked the court to ensure that the selection of the search committee complies with GIMPA’s 2020 Statutes. They also want the committee’s composition and the respective roles of the Governing Council and Convocation clarified.

GIMPA management, however, has indicated that a special ad hoc committee audited the Convocation register and confirmed that those listed had valid appointments, based on Human Resource Management records. Exceptions reportedly applied to staff on leave of absence or secondment.

The Convocation election proceeded on October 6. According to reports, Professor Patrick Tandoh-Offin contested to represent the professorial class but lost to Professor Emmanuel Gyamfi Numapau, who received 118 votes against Tandoh-Offin’s 35.

The legal challenge comes as GIMPA prepares for the end of Rector Professor Samuel Kwaku Bonsu’s tenure in August 2027. The Institute’s statutes require the search process to begin ahead of the incumbent’s departure.

The case raises questions about voting eligibility, institutional governance and the procedures for selecting the next Rector. The court’s determination could affect the process, although the available reports do not establish that an injunction has been granted or that the election

Continue Reading

General News

EPA ORDERS IMMEDIATE HALT TO UNAPPROVED RECLAMATION WORKS NATIONWIDE — GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, CONTRACTORS ON NOTICE

Published

on

The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has ordered an immediate halt to all land reclamation, mine-site rehabilitation, dredging and water-body restoration activities being undertaken without the requisite environmental permits across Ghana.

In a public notice issued on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, the Authority warned that institutions, companies, contractors and individuals operating without its approval must cease work immediately and report to the nearest EPA regional office or its head office for regulatory assessment.

The directive applies to both public and private projects, including government-sponsored, privately funded and donor-supported initiatives. The EPA specifically mentioned the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources, Forestry Commission, Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Minerals Commission and Mineral Development Fund among the institutions required to ensure compliance.

Under Regulation 40 of the Environmental Protection (Environmental Assessment) Regulations, 2025 (L.I. 2504), reclamation and restoration activities fall within Ghana’s environmental assessment and permitting framework.

The covered activities include rehabilitating abandoned mining sites, backfilling excavated areas, restoring degraded land, revegetation, dredging and desilting rivers, modifying river channels and restoring polluted water bodies, wetlands and aquatic ecosystems.

The Authority stressed that securing a contract, obtaining funding approval, holding a mining lease or receiving authorisation from another public institution does not replace an EPA Environmental Permit. Similarly, consent from traditional authorities, memoranda of understanding and participation in government programmes cannot substitute for the required approval.

Contracting institutions have also been directed to verify the environmental permit status of projects before allowing contractors to mobilise to their sites.

The EPA acknowledged the importance of restoring lands and water bodies damaged by illegal and irresponsible mining but cautioned that rehabilitation efforts must not create further environmental destruction by bypassing regulatory safeguards.

It warned that individuals and institutions that continue unapproved operations after the notice would face action in accordance with applicable Ghanaian laws.

The directive reinforces the Authority’s position that environmental restoration, regardless of its funding source or purpose, must comply with the country’s permitting requirements.

Continue Reading

General News

North Korea and China Open Long-Delayed Bridge

Published

on

The opening of the long-awaited New Yalu River Bridge marks a significant step towards strengthening cross-border transport and trade between China and North Korea.

China and North Korea have officially opened a major bridge linking the two countries, ending a 12-year delay that kept the infrastructure project unused despite its completion in 2014.

The New Yalu River Bridge connects the Chinese border city of Dandong, in Liaoning province, with Sinuiju in North Korea. The four-lane crossing stretches approximately three kilometres across the Yalu River and is expected to improve the movement of goods between the neighbouring countries.

The project was originally intended to begin operating in 2014. However, the opening was postponed for years as infrastructure on the North Korean side, including connecting roads and customs facilities, remained incomplete. Analysts have also pointed to strained bilateral relations and disagreements surrounding economic cooperation as possible contributing factors.

Trade and economic implications

The new crossing is expected to ease pressure on the older China–North Korea Friendship Bridge, which has served as a major route for official trade between the two countries.

By providing additional road capacity, the new bridge could improve freight transportation, reduce congestion and support the movement of essential goods. Its strategic location is particularly important because China remains North Korea’s principal trading partner.

Nevertheless, the opening does not automatically guarantee a rapid increase in trade. International sanctions imposed in response to North Korea’s nuclear and weapons programmes continue to constrain economic activity, while the scale of future commercial traffic will depend on border arrangements and the two governments’ economic policies.

A signal of closer bilateral engagement

The bridge’s inauguration comes amid renewed diplomatic engagement between Beijing and Pyongyang. It also highlights China’s continued economic importance to North Korea as the latter seeks to maintain relationships with key regional partners.

For China, improved transport links could facilitate cross-border commerce and support economic activity in Dandong. For North Korea, the bridge offers additional capacity for importing goods and developing commercial infrastructure around Sinuiju.

However, the project’s long delay illustrates how political disagreements and economic considerations can obstruct infrastructure intended to improve regional connectivity.

What happens next?

Attention will now turn to how quickly the bridge becomes an established route for commercial traffic and whether the additional capacity translates into measurable growth in bilateral trade.

While the opening represents an important infrastructure milestone, its longer-term economic and diplomatic impact will depend on the willingness of both governments to sustain cooperation and the restrictions governing North Korea’s international trade.

The opening ends a lengthy wait for the two countries, but the bridge’s ultimate significance will be measured by the trade and cooperation it enables in the years ahead.

Continue Reading

Trending