Connect with us

General News

Sudan Chemical Weapons Allegations: UN Signals Readiness for Possible Investigation

Published

on

By Angel No Lie | KPD Online | 25 September 2026

The United Nations has indicated that it could investigate allegations of chemical weapons use in Sudan if it receives the necessary mandate and authorization, as international concern grows over possible violations during the country’s ongoing civil war.

The potential investigation comes amid allegations involving forces aligned with Sudan’s military and reports of chemical agents allegedly being used in the conflict. UN officials have said they are prepared to examine the claims, but the scope of any investigation would depend on the mandate provided and the access granted to investigators.

Sudan: What You Need to Know After Two Years of Hell

Civilians Caught in Sudan’s Ongoing War

UN mission says it is prepared to examine allegations

The chair of the UN Independent International Fact-Finding Mission for Sudan has indicated that the mission is ready to examine allegations involving a possible chemical weapons programme linked to forces aligned with Sudan’s armed forces.

However, an investigation would require an appropriate mandate and the practical conditions necessary to gather evidence. These may include access to affected locations, interviews with witnesses and survivors, and the collection of medical and environmental samples.

The allegations have not been treated in this report as a final, independently established finding of chemical weapons use. Verification would require a formal investigative process and reliable evidence.

Sudan, a victim of foreign powers' greed

Evidence Challenges in a War-Damaged Country

Allegations emerge amid Sudan’s prolonged war

Sudan has been engulfed in conflict since April 2023, when fighting erupted between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF).

The war has caused extensive civilian displacement, damage to infrastructure and a severe humanitarian crisis. Both sides have faced allegations of violations of international humanitarian law, although the chemical weapons allegations represent a particularly serious area of concern because the use of chemical agents as weapons is prohibited under international law.

Reports and investigations cited in recent coverage have raised questions about possible chemical agents, including chlorine, being used in attacks. The available allegations require further examination to establish the substances involved, the circumstances of their use and responsibility for any confirmed incidents.

Expertos en DDHH respaldados por la ONU piden fuerza independiente para proteger a civiles de Sudán | Independent Español

UN Considers Response to Chemical Weapons Allegations

Why chemical weapons investigations matter

Chemical weapons are prohibited under the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), which bans the development, production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons.

The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) is the principal international body responsible for implementing the convention. The UN also has a Secretary-General’s Mechanism for investigating alleged uses of chemical and biological weapons, which can be activated through a request and appropriate authorization.

An investigation could potentially examine:

  • The substances allegedly used: Whether the materials qualify as chemical warfare agents.

  • The location and timing of attacks: Where and when the alleged incidents occurred.

  • The effects on civilians: Medical symptoms, injuries and potential environmental contamination.

  • Responsibility: Which individuals or forces may have ordered, carried out or facilitated any prohibited use.

  • Evidence preservation: Whether samples, witness accounts and other documentation can be independently verified.

The existence of an allegation does not, by itself, establish that a chemical weapons attack occurred or determine who was responsible.

Access and evidence remain major challenges

Investigating alleged chemical weapons use in an active war zone presents substantial practical difficulties.

Investigators may face restricted access to affected communities, damaged medical facilities, displaced witnesses and the deterioration or disappearance of physical evidence. Chemical substances can also be difficult to identify after an incident, making the collection and preservation of samples especially important.

The UN fact-finding mission has previously raised concerns about access and cooperation in its work on Sudan. A formal mandate would therefore need to be accompanied by arrangements allowing investigators to operate independently and safely.

Sudan’s government and international accountability

The Sudanese government has faced international scrutiny over allegations of abuses committed during the conflict. Reports about chemical weapons have added another layer to wider accountability efforts involving attacks on civilians, forced displacement and other alleged violations.

Any future investigation would need to distinguish between:

  1. Allegations and preliminary evidence gathered by rights groups, journalists or other organizations.

  2. Investigative findings based on documented evidence and expert analysis.

  3. Legal conclusions concerning responsibility and potential violations of international law.

These stages are separate. A credible allegation may justify an investigation without constituting proof of criminal responsibility.

What could happen next?

The next steps would depend on whether the UN mission receives a mandate broad enough to examine the allegations and whether investigators can obtain access to relevant sites and witnesses.

Possible developments include:

  • A formal decision authorizing an investigation.

  • Requests for information and evidence from parties to the conflict.

  • Cooperation with specialist chemical weapons experts and relevant international institutions.

  • A report outlining verified evidence, limitations and any findings on responsibility.

At present, the UN’s reported willingness to investigate should be understood as an indication of preparedness, not confirmation that a full investigation has already been authorized or completed.

Independent assessment

The allegations warrant careful international scrutiny because chemical weapons use, if confirmed, would raise serious concerns under international law. At the same time, credible reporting must distinguish documented evidence from unverified claims and avoid assigning responsibility before an investigation establishes the facts.

An effective investigation would depend on independence, access, scientific testing and protection for witnesses. Its findings could contribute to future accountability efforts, but the available public information does not yet establish the complete circumstances of the alleged incidents.

Sources

  • .

General News

GTA Regional Directors Raise Concerns Over CEO Maame Efua Houadjeto’s Leadership

Published

on

Fourteen Regional Directors of the Ghana Tourism Authority (GTA) have raised concerns about the leadership approach of the Authority’s Chief Executive Officer, Maame Efua Houadjeto, during a meeting with the Board of Directors to address what they describe as persistent organisational challenges.

The meeting, held on Monday, October 12, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., was convened to discuss issues the Regional Directors say have remained unresolved since July 2026.

According to the Directors, the engagement was not intended to serve as an arbitration process but rather to obtain responses to questions and concerns they had previously raised.

During the meeting, the Directors expressed their displeasure with the CEO’s leadership approach, highlighting concerns about stakeholder engagement, regional coordination and other issues they believe are affecting the effective operation of the Authority.

They indicated that the concerns extend beyond individual disagreements and touch on broader institutional matters that require attention to ensure the smooth functioning of the GTA.

The Directors maintained that their position was motivated by the need to safeguard the integrity of the institution and restore effective operations across its regional structures.

They also called on the Board of Directors to facilitate a formal response from the Office of the CEO to the issues raised, stressing the need for the concerns to be addressed through the appropriate institutional channels.

The engagement provided an opportunity for the Regional Directors to formally communicate their grievances to the Board and seek its intervention in resolving the outstanding matters.

The meeting ended with a call for further intervention by the Board of Directors to ensure that the issues raised receive the necessary attention and responses.

It remains unclear what specific questions have been pending since July, what responses the Regional Directors expect from the CEO, or what steps the Board intends to take following the meeting.

The outcome of any subsequent engagement between the Board, the CEO and the Regional Directors is expected to be important in determining how the concerns will be addressed and how coordination within the Authority will be strengthened.

Continue Reading

General News

Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, Son of Ghana’s First President, Dies in Cairo

Published

on

Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, son of Ghana’s founding President, Osagyefo Dr Kwame Nkrumah, has died in Cairo, Egypt, following a prolonged illness.

The Nkrumah family announced his death in a statement posted on the Facebook page of Samia Nkrumah, daughter of Ghana’s first president.

According to the statement, Gamal passed away peacefully in Cairo, where he had been receiving care at a rehabilitation centre after suffering a stroke.

The family described him as a beloved son, respected journalist, writer and intellectual who dedicated much of his life to examining the political, social and cultural developments shaping Africa and the wider world.

It said Gamal remained deeply committed to the ideals of justice, human dignity, African unity and international solidarity throughout his life.

As a journalist and commentator, he used his voice and intellect to analyse issues affecting Africa and the international community, earning recognition among friends, colleagues and readers who valued his insights and perspectives.

The family further described him as a man of profound intellectual curiosity, independent thought and quiet conviction, noting that he carried forward his father’s legacy in his own distinctive way while building a reputation based on his personal principles and achievements.

His death, the family said, represents a significant loss not only to his relatives and loved ones but also to the wider community of people who appreciated his work, humanity and engagement with important issues of his time.

The statement added that the family remembers Gamal with immense love, gratitude and pride, describing his wisdom, kindness and commitment to his values as an enduring source of inspiration.

The Nkrumah family also expressed appreciation to those who supported Gamal throughout his illness, particularly the medical professionals and caregivers in Cairo who provided him with treatment and care.

It extended its gratitude to the governments and people of both Egypt and Ghana for their support during the difficult period.

The family has appealed to the public to respect its privacy as it mourns the loss.

Details of memorial arrangements and opportunities for the public to pay tribute to Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah’s life and legacy, according to the statement, will be communicated in due course.

https://web.facebook.com/share/p/1DTR2Ht1fH/

Continue Reading

General News

FOUR PROFESSORS SUE TO HALT GIMPA RECTOR SEARCH PROCESS AMID CONTROVERSY

Published

on

Four professors at the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) have filed a lawsuit seeking to halt aspects of the process to select a search committee for the appointment of a new Rector, escalating tensions over the institution’s leadership transition.

The plaintiffs are Professors Lord Mawuko Yevugah, Wisdom Akpalu, Kwami Adanu and Patrick Tandoh-Offin. They filed the action on October 5, 2026, challenging aspects of the process involving the Chairman of GIMPA’s Governing Council, the Institute’s Secretary and the Rector.

At the centre of the dispute is the Convocation register used to determine who could vote for representatives on the Rector Search Committee. The professors contend that about 30 newly appointed or promoted lecturers were included on the register despite questions over whether their appointments had received the necessary approval from the Governing Council.

They argue that allowing the lecturers to participate in the election could undermine the legitimacy of the process and have asked the court to ensure that the selection of the search committee complies with GIMPA’s 2020 Statutes. They also want the committee’s composition and the respective roles of the Governing Council and Convocation clarified.

GIMPA management, however, has indicated that a special ad hoc committee audited the Convocation register and confirmed that those listed had valid appointments, based on Human Resource Management records. Exceptions reportedly applied to staff on leave of absence or secondment.

The Convocation election proceeded on October 6. According to reports, Professor Patrick Tandoh-Offin contested to represent the professorial class but lost to Professor Emmanuel Gyamfi Numapau, who received 118 votes against Tandoh-Offin’s 35.

The legal challenge comes as GIMPA prepares for the end of Rector Professor Samuel Kwaku Bonsu’s tenure in August 2027. The Institute’s statutes require the search process to begin ahead of the incumbent’s departure.

The case raises questions about voting eligibility, institutional governance and the procedures for selecting the next Rector. The court’s determination could affect the process, although the available reports do not establish that an injunction has been granted or that the election

Continue Reading

General News

EPA ORDERS IMMEDIATE HALT TO UNAPPROVED RECLAMATION WORKS NATIONWIDE — GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, CONTRACTORS ON NOTICE

Published

on

The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has ordered an immediate halt to all land reclamation, mine-site rehabilitation, dredging and water-body restoration activities being undertaken without the requisite environmental permits across Ghana.

In a public notice issued on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, the Authority warned that institutions, companies, contractors and individuals operating without its approval must cease work immediately and report to the nearest EPA regional office or its head office for regulatory assessment.

The directive applies to both public and private projects, including government-sponsored, privately funded and donor-supported initiatives. The EPA specifically mentioned the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources, Forestry Commission, Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Minerals Commission and Mineral Development Fund among the institutions required to ensure compliance.

Under Regulation 40 of the Environmental Protection (Environmental Assessment) Regulations, 2025 (L.I. 2504), reclamation and restoration activities fall within Ghana’s environmental assessment and permitting framework.

The covered activities include rehabilitating abandoned mining sites, backfilling excavated areas, restoring degraded land, revegetation, dredging and desilting rivers, modifying river channels and restoring polluted water bodies, wetlands and aquatic ecosystems.

The Authority stressed that securing a contract, obtaining funding approval, holding a mining lease or receiving authorisation from another public institution does not replace an EPA Environmental Permit. Similarly, consent from traditional authorities, memoranda of understanding and participation in government programmes cannot substitute for the required approval.

Contracting institutions have also been directed to verify the environmental permit status of projects before allowing contractors to mobilise to their sites.

The EPA acknowledged the importance of restoring lands and water bodies damaged by illegal and irresponsible mining but cautioned that rehabilitation efforts must not create further environmental destruction by bypassing regulatory safeguards.

It warned that individuals and institutions that continue unapproved operations after the notice would face action in accordance with applicable Ghanaian laws.

The directive reinforces the Authority’s position that environmental restoration, regardless of its funding source or purpose, must comply with the country’s permitting requirements.

Continue Reading

General News

North Korea and China Open Long-Delayed Bridge

Published

on

The opening of the long-awaited New Yalu River Bridge marks a significant step towards strengthening cross-border transport and trade between China and North Korea.

China and North Korea have officially opened a major bridge linking the two countries, ending a 12-year delay that kept the infrastructure project unused despite its completion in 2014.

The New Yalu River Bridge connects the Chinese border city of Dandong, in Liaoning province, with Sinuiju in North Korea. The four-lane crossing stretches approximately three kilometres across the Yalu River and is expected to improve the movement of goods between the neighbouring countries.

The project was originally intended to begin operating in 2014. However, the opening was postponed for years as infrastructure on the North Korean side, including connecting roads and customs facilities, remained incomplete. Analysts have also pointed to strained bilateral relations and disagreements surrounding economic cooperation as possible contributing factors.

Trade and economic implications

The new crossing is expected to ease pressure on the older China–North Korea Friendship Bridge, which has served as a major route for official trade between the two countries.

By providing additional road capacity, the new bridge could improve freight transportation, reduce congestion and support the movement of essential goods. Its strategic location is particularly important because China remains North Korea’s principal trading partner.

Nevertheless, the opening does not automatically guarantee a rapid increase in trade. International sanctions imposed in response to North Korea’s nuclear and weapons programmes continue to constrain economic activity, while the scale of future commercial traffic will depend on border arrangements and the two governments’ economic policies.

A signal of closer bilateral engagement

The bridge’s inauguration comes amid renewed diplomatic engagement between Beijing and Pyongyang. It also highlights China’s continued economic importance to North Korea as the latter seeks to maintain relationships with key regional partners.

For China, improved transport links could facilitate cross-border commerce and support economic activity in Dandong. For North Korea, the bridge offers additional capacity for importing goods and developing commercial infrastructure around Sinuiju.

However, the project’s long delay illustrates how political disagreements and economic considerations can obstruct infrastructure intended to improve regional connectivity.

What happens next?

Attention will now turn to how quickly the bridge becomes an established route for commercial traffic and whether the additional capacity translates into measurable growth in bilateral trade.

While the opening represents an important infrastructure milestone, its longer-term economic and diplomatic impact will depend on the willingness of both governments to sustain cooperation and the restrictions governing North Korea’s international trade.

The opening ends a lengthy wait for the two countries, but the bridge’s ultimate significance will be measured by the trade and cooperation it enables in the years ahead.

Continue Reading

Trending