Connect with us

General News

US Refugee Policy Shifts Toward Afrikaner Resettlement Under New Trump Proposal

Published

on

The administration of US President Donald Trump plans to set a refugee admissions ceiling of 17,500 people over the next 12 months, with the majority expected to come from South Africa’s white Afrikaner minority, according to a notice sent to Congress.

The proposal represents a continuation of the administration’s decision to prioritize Afrikaner applicants, while the United States’ broader refugee resettlement program remains substantially restricted compared with previous years. The plan has prompted criticism from refugee advocacy organizations and disagreement between Washington and Pretoria over the treatment of South Africa’s white minority.

Trump administration cuts refugee admissions to record low, gives priority to white South Africans - ABC News

Trump administration cuts refugee admissions to record low, gives priority to white South Africans – ABC News

What the proposal includes

According to the notice reported by Reuters, the proposed refugee ceiling is:

Proposed annual refugee ceiling

17,500

Primary intended group

Afrikaners from South Africa

Estimated resettlement cost

$500 million

Status

Proposed ceiling

The State Department notice reportedly states that it anticipates Afrikaners will assimilate into the United States in a way that preserves taxpayer resources for American citizens. The estimated cost of resettlement under the proposed ceiling is approximately $500 million.

The proposal establishes a ceiling rather than confirming that all 17,500 places have already been filled or that every applicant will qualify for refugee status.

Buffelsdrift Farm, Vyversrus (updated prices 2026)

Buffelsdrift Farm, Vyversrus (updated prices 2026)

Why Afrikaners are being prioritized

The Trump administration has argued that Afrikaners face racial discrimination and persecution in South Africa. The president has repeatedly cited concerns involving rural crime, land policy and alleged discrimination against white South Africans.

The South African government has rejected the administration’s allegations, disputing the characterization of the country as a place where Afrikaners face systematic racial persecution.

Refugee status under US law is ordinarily based on an individual’s circumstances and eligibility under established protection criteria. The policy debate therefore involves both the administration’s stated justification for prioritizing a particular group and questions about how refugee selection should be administered.

Khan Academy

Khan Academy

A sharp change in US refugee admissions

The proposed ceiling follows a major reduction in US refugee admissions under the Trump administration.

The United States suspended refugee admissions after Trump returned to office in January 2025, stating that the program would resume only when considered to be in the national interest. The administration subsequently launched a specific initiative to bring Afrikaners from South Africa to the United States.

According to State Department data cited by Reuters, nearly 3,000 refugees had been admitted during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and all but three were South Africans, based on figures available through August.

That contrasts with fiscal year 2024, when the Biden administration admitted more than 100,000 refugees from multiple countries. The figures cover different policy periods and should not be interpreted as a direct measure of the relative level of humanitarian need among populations.

Criticism from refugee advocates

The proposed focus on Afrikaners has drawn criticism from organizations that support refugee resettlement.

Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, president and chief executive of Global Refuge, said that concentrating the program on one group while excluding others fleeing persecution and violence undermines the United States’ humanitarian role.

The criticism centers on whether a refugee program should prioritize people based on a broad group identity or apply a more geographically and nationally diverse approach to applicants facing persecution.

The administration, meanwhile, presents the policy as a response to what it describes as racial discrimination in South Africa and as part of a wider effort to align refugee resettlement with US national interests.

Dispute between Washington and Pretoria

The refugee proposal is part of a wider deterioration in relations between the United States and South Africa.

Washington has criticized South African land legislation, affirmative-action policies and the government’s response to violence affecting farming communities. South African officials have rejected the US administration’s claims of systematic anti-white persecution and have characterized the policy as discriminatory.

The two governments therefore differ not only over refugee admissions but also over the factual interpretation of race, land ownership, public safety and government policy in post-apartheid South Africa.

Key questions surrounding the plan

Issue

What is known

Number of places

The proposed ceiling is 17,500 refugees over 12 months.

Main beneficiary group

Afrikaners from South Africa are expected to make up most admissions.

Cost

Resettlement is estimated at approximately $500 million.

Legal status

The announcement concerns a proposed admissions ceiling, not automatic refugee approval for all applicants.

Wider impact

Advocates argue that other vulnerable refugee populations could be sidelined.

Independent assessment

The proposal marks a significant shift in the composition of US refugee admissions, with the administration explicitly indicating that one national and ethnic group will make up the majority of the planned intake.

The central disagreement is not simply about the number of refugees the United States will accept. It also concerns how humanitarian protection should be prioritized, what evidence establishes persecution, and whether a refugee program should focus heavily on a particular ethnic population while admissions from other parts of the world remain limited.

The South African government’s rejection of Washington’s allegations and the objections raised by refugee organizations should be considered alongside the Trump administration’s stated rationale. The available reporting confirms the proposed ceiling and its intended focus, but the long-term consequences for the US refugee system and US–South Africa relations will depend on how the policy is implemented.

Sources: Reuters reporting published September 22–23, 2026, and related reporting on the US–South Africa dispute.

General News

GTA Regional Directors Raise Concerns Over CEO Maame Efua Houadjeto’s Leadership

Published

on

Fourteen Regional Directors of the Ghana Tourism Authority (GTA) have raised concerns about the leadership approach of the Authority’s Chief Executive Officer, Maame Efua Houadjeto, during a meeting with the Board of Directors to address what they describe as persistent organisational challenges.

The meeting, held on Monday, October 12, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., was convened to discuss issues the Regional Directors say have remained unresolved since July 2026.

According to the Directors, the engagement was not intended to serve as an arbitration process but rather to obtain responses to questions and concerns they had previously raised.

During the meeting, the Directors expressed their displeasure with the CEO’s leadership approach, highlighting concerns about stakeholder engagement, regional coordination and other issues they believe are affecting the effective operation of the Authority.

They indicated that the concerns extend beyond individual disagreements and touch on broader institutional matters that require attention to ensure the smooth functioning of the GTA.

The Directors maintained that their position was motivated by the need to safeguard the integrity of the institution and restore effective operations across its regional structures.

They also called on the Board of Directors to facilitate a formal response from the Office of the CEO to the issues raised, stressing the need for the concerns to be addressed through the appropriate institutional channels.

The engagement provided an opportunity for the Regional Directors to formally communicate their grievances to the Board and seek its intervention in resolving the outstanding matters.

The meeting ended with a call for further intervention by the Board of Directors to ensure that the issues raised receive the necessary attention and responses.

It remains unclear what specific questions have been pending since July, what responses the Regional Directors expect from the CEO, or what steps the Board intends to take following the meeting.

The outcome of any subsequent engagement between the Board, the CEO and the Regional Directors is expected to be important in determining how the concerns will be addressed and how coordination within the Authority will be strengthened.

Continue Reading

General News

Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, Son of Ghana’s First President, Dies in Cairo

Published

on

Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, son of Ghana’s founding President, Osagyefo Dr Kwame Nkrumah, has died in Cairo, Egypt, following a prolonged illness.

The Nkrumah family announced his death in a statement posted on the Facebook page of Samia Nkrumah, daughter of Ghana’s first president.

According to the statement, Gamal passed away peacefully in Cairo, where he had been receiving care at a rehabilitation centre after suffering a stroke.

The family described him as a beloved son, respected journalist, writer and intellectual who dedicated much of his life to examining the political, social and cultural developments shaping Africa and the wider world.

It said Gamal remained deeply committed to the ideals of justice, human dignity, African unity and international solidarity throughout his life.

As a journalist and commentator, he used his voice and intellect to analyse issues affecting Africa and the international community, earning recognition among friends, colleagues and readers who valued his insights and perspectives.

The family further described him as a man of profound intellectual curiosity, independent thought and quiet conviction, noting that he carried forward his father’s legacy in his own distinctive way while building a reputation based on his personal principles and achievements.

His death, the family said, represents a significant loss not only to his relatives and loved ones but also to the wider community of people who appreciated his work, humanity and engagement with important issues of his time.

The statement added that the family remembers Gamal with immense love, gratitude and pride, describing his wisdom, kindness and commitment to his values as an enduring source of inspiration.

The Nkrumah family also expressed appreciation to those who supported Gamal throughout his illness, particularly the medical professionals and caregivers in Cairo who provided him with treatment and care.

It extended its gratitude to the governments and people of both Egypt and Ghana for their support during the difficult period.

The family has appealed to the public to respect its privacy as it mourns the loss.

Details of memorial arrangements and opportunities for the public to pay tribute to Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah’s life and legacy, according to the statement, will be communicated in due course.

https://web.facebook.com/share/p/1DTR2Ht1fH/

Continue Reading

General News

FOUR PROFESSORS SUE TO HALT GIMPA RECTOR SEARCH PROCESS AMID CONTROVERSY

Published

on

Four professors at the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) have filed a lawsuit seeking to halt aspects of the process to select a search committee for the appointment of a new Rector, escalating tensions over the institution’s leadership transition.

The plaintiffs are Professors Lord Mawuko Yevugah, Wisdom Akpalu, Kwami Adanu and Patrick Tandoh-Offin. They filed the action on October 5, 2026, challenging aspects of the process involving the Chairman of GIMPA’s Governing Council, the Institute’s Secretary and the Rector.

At the centre of the dispute is the Convocation register used to determine who could vote for representatives on the Rector Search Committee. The professors contend that about 30 newly appointed or promoted lecturers were included on the register despite questions over whether their appointments had received the necessary approval from the Governing Council.

They argue that allowing the lecturers to participate in the election could undermine the legitimacy of the process and have asked the court to ensure that the selection of the search committee complies with GIMPA’s 2020 Statutes. They also want the committee’s composition and the respective roles of the Governing Council and Convocation clarified.

GIMPA management, however, has indicated that a special ad hoc committee audited the Convocation register and confirmed that those listed had valid appointments, based on Human Resource Management records. Exceptions reportedly applied to staff on leave of absence or secondment.

The Convocation election proceeded on October 6. According to reports, Professor Patrick Tandoh-Offin contested to represent the professorial class but lost to Professor Emmanuel Gyamfi Numapau, who received 118 votes against Tandoh-Offin’s 35.

The legal challenge comes as GIMPA prepares for the end of Rector Professor Samuel Kwaku Bonsu’s tenure in August 2027. The Institute’s statutes require the search process to begin ahead of the incumbent’s departure.

The case raises questions about voting eligibility, institutional governance and the procedures for selecting the next Rector. The court’s determination could affect the process, although the available reports do not establish that an injunction has been granted or that the election

Continue Reading

General News

EPA ORDERS IMMEDIATE HALT TO UNAPPROVED RECLAMATION WORKS NATIONWIDE — GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, CONTRACTORS ON NOTICE

Published

on

The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has ordered an immediate halt to all land reclamation, mine-site rehabilitation, dredging and water-body restoration activities being undertaken without the requisite environmental permits across Ghana.

In a public notice issued on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, the Authority warned that institutions, companies, contractors and individuals operating without its approval must cease work immediately and report to the nearest EPA regional office or its head office for regulatory assessment.

The directive applies to both public and private projects, including government-sponsored, privately funded and donor-supported initiatives. The EPA specifically mentioned the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources, Forestry Commission, Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Minerals Commission and Mineral Development Fund among the institutions required to ensure compliance.

Under Regulation 40 of the Environmental Protection (Environmental Assessment) Regulations, 2025 (L.I. 2504), reclamation and restoration activities fall within Ghana’s environmental assessment and permitting framework.

The covered activities include rehabilitating abandoned mining sites, backfilling excavated areas, restoring degraded land, revegetation, dredging and desilting rivers, modifying river channels and restoring polluted water bodies, wetlands and aquatic ecosystems.

The Authority stressed that securing a contract, obtaining funding approval, holding a mining lease or receiving authorisation from another public institution does not replace an EPA Environmental Permit. Similarly, consent from traditional authorities, memoranda of understanding and participation in government programmes cannot substitute for the required approval.

Contracting institutions have also been directed to verify the environmental permit status of projects before allowing contractors to mobilise to their sites.

The EPA acknowledged the importance of restoring lands and water bodies damaged by illegal and irresponsible mining but cautioned that rehabilitation efforts must not create further environmental destruction by bypassing regulatory safeguards.

It warned that individuals and institutions that continue unapproved operations after the notice would face action in accordance with applicable Ghanaian laws.

The directive reinforces the Authority’s position that environmental restoration, regardless of its funding source or purpose, must comply with the country’s permitting requirements.

Continue Reading

General News

North Korea and China Open Long-Delayed Bridge

Published

on

The opening of the long-awaited New Yalu River Bridge marks a significant step towards strengthening cross-border transport and trade between China and North Korea.

China and North Korea have officially opened a major bridge linking the two countries, ending a 12-year delay that kept the infrastructure project unused despite its completion in 2014.

The New Yalu River Bridge connects the Chinese border city of Dandong, in Liaoning province, with Sinuiju in North Korea. The four-lane crossing stretches approximately three kilometres across the Yalu River and is expected to improve the movement of goods between the neighbouring countries.

The project was originally intended to begin operating in 2014. However, the opening was postponed for years as infrastructure on the North Korean side, including connecting roads and customs facilities, remained incomplete. Analysts have also pointed to strained bilateral relations and disagreements surrounding economic cooperation as possible contributing factors.

Trade and economic implications

The new crossing is expected to ease pressure on the older China–North Korea Friendship Bridge, which has served as a major route for official trade between the two countries.

By providing additional road capacity, the new bridge could improve freight transportation, reduce congestion and support the movement of essential goods. Its strategic location is particularly important because China remains North Korea’s principal trading partner.

Nevertheless, the opening does not automatically guarantee a rapid increase in trade. International sanctions imposed in response to North Korea’s nuclear and weapons programmes continue to constrain economic activity, while the scale of future commercial traffic will depend on border arrangements and the two governments’ economic policies.

A signal of closer bilateral engagement

The bridge’s inauguration comes amid renewed diplomatic engagement between Beijing and Pyongyang. It also highlights China’s continued economic importance to North Korea as the latter seeks to maintain relationships with key regional partners.

For China, improved transport links could facilitate cross-border commerce and support economic activity in Dandong. For North Korea, the bridge offers additional capacity for importing goods and developing commercial infrastructure around Sinuiju.

However, the project’s long delay illustrates how political disagreements and economic considerations can obstruct infrastructure intended to improve regional connectivity.

What happens next?

Attention will now turn to how quickly the bridge becomes an established route for commercial traffic and whether the additional capacity translates into measurable growth in bilateral trade.

While the opening represents an important infrastructure milestone, its longer-term economic and diplomatic impact will depend on the willingness of both governments to sustain cooperation and the restrictions governing North Korea’s international trade.

The opening ends a lengthy wait for the two countries, but the bridge’s ultimate significance will be measured by the trade and cooperation it enables in the years ahead.

Continue Reading

Trending