General News
Can TVET Teachers Join the September GES Strike? Legal Questions Emerge
Questions have emerged over whether teachers who were formerly under the Ghana Education Service (GES) but have since migrated to the Ghana TVET Service can join the nationwide strike declared by the Ghana National Association of Teachers (GNAT), the National Association of Graduate Teachers (NAGRAT) and the Pre-Tertiary Education Teachers Union of Ghana (PRETAG).
The debate has become particularly significant following the nationwide strike declared on September 25, 2026, over concerns including promotions, the 20 per cent deprived-area allowance and the GES Collective Agreement.
A guidance and counselling analysis by Seth Afum A. Dankwah of J. G. Knol Technical Institute at Adukrom-Akuapem argues that the central issue is not simply union membership but the identity of the employer against whom the industrial action was declared.
The analysis contends that the reorganisation of pre-tertiary education has created two distinct public education services — the Ghana Education Service and the Ghana TVET Service — making it necessary for future strike declarations to clearly identify the affected employer.
The Ghana TVET Service was established under the Pre-Tertiary Education Act, 2020 (Act 1049), as a corporate body responsible for managing, overseeing and implementing approved national policies and programmes relating to pre-tertiary technical and vocational education and training.
The establishment of the Service also resulted in the realignment of TVET institutions previously operating under different ministries and agencies. The Ghana TVET Service says institutions formerly associated with GES-TVED, NVTI, OIC, Social Welfare Training Centres, Youth Leadership Training Institutes, GRATIS, Technology Solution Centres, Farm Institutes and other entities were brought under the Service.
The restructuring means that technical and vocational institutions that were previously administered through GES are now managed within the Ghana TVET Service structure.
The Service’s Human Resource Management and Development Division is responsible for functions including recruitment and placement, performance management, staff development and labour-related advisory matters.
According to the analysis, several teachers who were originally employed through GES technical institutions migrated to the Ghana TVET Service.
However, some of those migrated teachers retained their memberships in unions including GNAT, NAGRAT and PRETAG and continue to pay union dues.
That situation, the analysis argues, has created confusion whenever the unions declare industrial action involving GES.
The analysis recounts an incident on Monday, September 29, 2026, when a parent in Accra reportedly called his son, who was attending a technical institute, after hearing that teachers had gone on strike.
The student reportedly told the parent that some teachers had said they were on strike, but the Principal had instructed students to remain in class because the teachers were TVET teachers rather than GES teachers.
According to the analysis, some migrated TVET teachers were similarly uncertain about whether they were expected to join the industrial action because they remained members of the unions that declared it.
The position reportedly communicated by some principals was that the strike concerned the Ghana Education Service and therefore did not apply to employees whose current employer is the Ghana TVET Service.
The analysis makes a distinction between union membership and the employer involved in an industrial dispute.
It argues that a teacher can remain a member of GNAT, NAGRAT or PRETAG after migrating from GES to the Ghana TVET Service, but that membership alone does not automatically make every industrial action declared by the union applicable to the teacher’s current employer.
The analysis therefore maintains that the September 25 strike was directed at GES and that teachers whose employment is now with the Ghana TVET Service should not automatically withdraw their services from TVET institutions.
This interpretation, however, is presented as a legal and labour-relations analysis rather than a formal determination by the National Labour Commission or a court.
The analysis relies heavily on the Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651), particularly the provisions dealing with strikes and sympathy action.
Section 168(1) provides that, subject to the requirements in Sections 159 and 160, a strike may be lawful where it is undertaken in sympathy with or in support of another group of workers engaged in an industrial dispute with their employer.
The same section, however, places restrictions on how sympathy action may be conducted.
Section 168(3) provides that the form of a sympathy strike must be agreed with the management of the sympathising workers and must not disrupt the operational activities of the enterprise whose workers are expressing sympathy.
The analysis consequently argues that migrated TVET teachers could potentially express solidarity with GES teachers, but that such solidarity would have to comply with the requirements of Act 651.
Examples suggested include wearing red armbands or issuing a statement of solidarity without abandoning teaching duties.
The analysis maintains that a complete withdrawal of services at a TVET institution could raise a different legal issue because the Ghana TVET Service is not the employer involved in the GES dispute.
Section 168(4) of Act 651 states that a worker who participates in an illegal strike may have their services terminated without notice for breach of the employment contract or may forfeit remuneration for the period of the illegal strike.
The analysis therefore cautions migrated teachers against assuming that union membership, by itself, provides protection for participating in a strike that concerns a different employer.
At the same time, Section 169 provides legal protection for employment relationships during a lawful strike or lockout, making the distinction between lawful and unlawful industrial action important.
According to the analysis, GNAT, NAGRAT and PRETAG declared the September 25 nationwide strike over issues involving GES, including promotions, the 20 per cent deprived-area allowance and the GES Collective Agreement.
It argues that the use of the phrase Nationwide Strike by Pre-Tertiary Teachers in the communication created ambiguity because the phrase “pre-tertiary teachers” can now encompass employees operating under both GES and the Ghana TVET Service.
The analysis suggests that specifying pre-tertiary teachers under GES would have made the scope of the action clearer to migrated TVET personnel.
The analysis further states that six unions have members within various TVET institutions:
- Public Services Workers’ Union (PSWU)
- Ghana National Association of Teachers (GNAT)
- National Association of Graduate Teachers (NAGRAT)
- Pre-Tertiary Education Teachers Union of Ghana (PRETAG)
- Teachers and Educational Workers’ Union (TEWU)
- Civil and Local Government Staff Association, Ghana (CLOGSAG)
It argues that the presence of these unions within TVET institutions does not change the fact that the Ghana TVET Service is the employer responsible for those institutions.
The analysis also contrasts the September GES strike with an earlier industrial dispute involving the Ghana TVET Service.
It states that the Public Services Workers’ Union declared a strike against the Ghana TVET Service on March 24, 2026.
According to the analysis, TVET staff who were members of GNAT, NAGRAT and PRETAG continued working during that action because their unions had not instructed them to participate.
The analysis says TVET management subsequently invited the unions affiliated with the Service to discussions concerning the validation of the TVET Conditions of Service.
It lists PSWU, GNAT, NAGRAT, TEWU, CLOGSAG and PRETAG among the unions involved in the TVET labour discussions.
The analysis argues that this episode demonstrates the importance of identifying the employer involved in every industrial dispute.
The analysis also points to concerns affecting migrated staff, including alleged 2024 arrears, migration downgrades, movement of points and delays relating to Conditions of Service.
It argues that these issues are separate from the concerns cited in the September GES strike.
According to the analysis, if TVET unions collectively wished to take industrial action over those TVET-specific concerns, the dispute would need to be directed at the Ghana TVET Service rather than GES.
Another issue raised is whether union officers involved in the September action should visit TVET institutions to encourage staff to join the strike.
The analysis argues against such enforcement, citing three main reasons.
First, it says TVET institutions are no longer under GES administration.
Second, it argues that enforcing a GES strike against employees of the Ghana TVET Service would involve workers whose employer is not a party to the underlying dispute.
Third, it refers to Section 171 of Act 651 on picketing.
The analysis says peaceful picketing is tied to the workplace of the workers involved in the dispute and therefore questions attempts to enforce the GES strike at TVET institutions.
It further argues that Section 168(3), which governs sympathy action, prevents such action from disrupting the operations of the sympathising enterprise.
To address the confusion, the analysis proposes that GNAT, NAGRAT and PRETAG issue a clarification to migrated members working under the Ghana TVET Service.
The proposed clarification would state that the September 25 strike concerns GES issues and advise members now employed by the Ghana TVET Service to remain at post while pursuing their TVET-specific concerns through the appropriate engagement channels.
It also proposes that any solidarity action should comply with Section 168(3) of Act 651 and should not disrupt teaching and learning within TVET institutions.
The central argument of the analysis is that the phrase “pre-tertiary teacher” can no longer automatically be treated as synonymous with “GES teacher.”
The Ghana TVET Service is now a separate statutory institution responsible for pre-tertiary technical and vocational education and training under Act 1049.
Consequently, the analysis calls on unions to clearly identify the employer targeted whenever they announce future industrial action.
It argues that a simple clarification such as a nationwide strike by pre-tertiary teachers under GES could prevent similar confusion among staff who migrated from GES to the Ghana TVET Service but retained membership in their former unions.
The issue ultimately turns on the relationship between union membership, the worker’s current employer and the legal requirements governing industrial action.
Under Act 651, sympathy strikes are recognised, but the law also places conditions on how such action can be conducted.
The analysis therefore concludes that the September dispute should not be treated as automatically extending to all teachers working within Ghana’s wider pre-tertiary education system without considering the employer and the legal basis of the industrial action.

General News
GTA Regional Directors Raise Concerns Over CEO Maame Efua Houadjeto’s Leadership
Fourteen Regional Directors of the Ghana Tourism Authority (GTA) have raised concerns about the leadership approach of the Authority’s Chief Executive Officer, Maame Efua Houadjeto, during a meeting with the Board of Directors to address what they describe as persistent organisational challenges.
The meeting, held on Monday, October 12, 2026, at 3:00 p.m., was convened to discuss issues the Regional Directors say have remained unresolved since July 2026.
According to the Directors, the engagement was not intended to serve as an arbitration process but rather to obtain responses to questions and concerns they had previously raised.
During the meeting, the Directors expressed their displeasure with the CEO’s leadership approach, highlighting concerns about stakeholder engagement, regional coordination and other issues they believe are affecting the effective operation of the Authority.
They indicated that the concerns extend beyond individual disagreements and touch on broader institutional matters that require attention to ensure the smooth functioning of the GTA.
The Directors maintained that their position was motivated by the need to safeguard the integrity of the institution and restore effective operations across its regional structures.
They also called on the Board of Directors to facilitate a formal response from the Office of the CEO to the issues raised, stressing the need for the concerns to be addressed through the appropriate institutional channels.
The engagement provided an opportunity for the Regional Directors to formally communicate their grievances to the Board and seek its intervention in resolving the outstanding matters.
The meeting ended with a call for further intervention by the Board of Directors to ensure that the issues raised receive the necessary attention and responses.
It remains unclear what specific questions have been pending since July, what responses the Regional Directors expect from the CEO, or what steps the Board intends to take following the meeting.
The outcome of any subsequent engagement between the Board, the CEO and the Regional Directors is expected to be important in determining how the concerns will be addressed and how coordination within the Authority will be strengthened.
General News
Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, Son of Ghana’s First President, Dies in Cairo
Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah, son of Ghana’s founding President, Osagyefo Dr Kwame Nkrumah, has died in Cairo, Egypt, following a prolonged illness.
The Nkrumah family announced his death in a statement posted on the Facebook page of Samia Nkrumah, daughter of Ghana’s first president.
According to the statement, Gamal passed away peacefully in Cairo, where he had been receiving care at a rehabilitation centre after suffering a stroke.
The family described him as a beloved son, respected journalist, writer and intellectual who dedicated much of his life to examining the political, social and cultural developments shaping Africa and the wider world.
It said Gamal remained deeply committed to the ideals of justice, human dignity, African unity and international solidarity throughout his life.
As a journalist and commentator, he used his voice and intellect to analyse issues affecting Africa and the international community, earning recognition among friends, colleagues and readers who valued his insights and perspectives.
The family further described him as a man of profound intellectual curiosity, independent thought and quiet conviction, noting that he carried forward his father’s legacy in his own distinctive way while building a reputation based on his personal principles and achievements.
His death, the family said, represents a significant loss not only to his relatives and loved ones but also to the wider community of people who appreciated his work, humanity and engagement with important issues of his time.
The statement added that the family remembers Gamal with immense love, gratitude and pride, describing his wisdom, kindness and commitment to his values as an enduring source of inspiration.
The Nkrumah family also expressed appreciation to those who supported Gamal throughout his illness, particularly the medical professionals and caregivers in Cairo who provided him with treatment and care.
It extended its gratitude to the governments and people of both Egypt and Ghana for their support during the difficult period.
The family has appealed to the public to respect its privacy as it mourns the loss.
Details of memorial arrangements and opportunities for the public to pay tribute to Gamal Gorkeh Nkrumah’s life and legacy, according to the statement, will be communicated in due course.
General News
FOUR PROFESSORS SUE TO HALT GIMPA RECTOR SEARCH PROCESS AMID CONTROVERSY
Four professors at the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) have filed a lawsuit seeking to halt aspects of the process to select a search committee for the appointment of a new Rector, escalating tensions over the institution’s leadership transition.
The plaintiffs are Professors Lord Mawuko Yevugah, Wisdom Akpalu, Kwami Adanu and Patrick Tandoh-Offin. They filed the action on October 5, 2026, challenging aspects of the process involving the Chairman of GIMPA’s Governing Council, the Institute’s Secretary and the Rector.
At the centre of the dispute is the Convocation register used to determine who could vote for representatives on the Rector Search Committee. The professors contend that about 30 newly appointed or promoted lecturers were included on the register despite questions over whether their appointments had received the necessary approval from the Governing Council.
They argue that allowing the lecturers to participate in the election could undermine the legitimacy of the process and have asked the court to ensure that the selection of the search committee complies with GIMPA’s 2020 Statutes. They also want the committee’s composition and the respective roles of the Governing Council and Convocation clarified.
GIMPA management, however, has indicated that a special ad hoc committee audited the Convocation register and confirmed that those listed had valid appointments, based on Human Resource Management records. Exceptions reportedly applied to staff on leave of absence or secondment.
The Convocation election proceeded on October 6. According to reports, Professor Patrick Tandoh-Offin contested to represent the professorial class but lost to Professor Emmanuel Gyamfi Numapau, who received 118 votes against Tandoh-Offin’s 35.
The legal challenge comes as GIMPA prepares for the end of Rector Professor Samuel Kwaku Bonsu’s tenure in August 2027. The Institute’s statutes require the search process to begin ahead of the incumbent’s departure.
The case raises questions about voting eligibility, institutional governance and the procedures for selecting the next Rector. The court’s determination could affect the process, although the available reports do not establish that an injunction has been granted or that the election
General News
EPA ORDERS IMMEDIATE HALT TO UNAPPROVED RECLAMATION WORKS NATIONWIDE — GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, CONTRACTORS ON NOTICE
The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has ordered an immediate halt to all land reclamation, mine-site rehabilitation, dredging and water-body restoration activities being undertaken without the requisite environmental permits across Ghana.
In a public notice issued on Wednesday, October 14, 2026, the Authority warned that institutions, companies, contractors and individuals operating without its approval must cease work immediately and report to the nearest EPA regional office or its head office for regulatory assessment.
The directive applies to both public and private projects, including government-sponsored, privately funded and donor-supported initiatives. The EPA specifically mentioned the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources, Forestry Commission, Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), Minerals Commission and Mineral Development Fund among the institutions required to ensure compliance.
Under Regulation 40 of the Environmental Protection (Environmental Assessment) Regulations, 2025 (L.I. 2504), reclamation and restoration activities fall within Ghana’s environmental assessment and permitting framework.
The covered activities include rehabilitating abandoned mining sites, backfilling excavated areas, restoring degraded land, revegetation, dredging and desilting rivers, modifying river channels and restoring polluted water bodies, wetlands and aquatic ecosystems.
The Authority stressed that securing a contract, obtaining funding approval, holding a mining lease or receiving authorisation from another public institution does not replace an EPA Environmental Permit. Similarly, consent from traditional authorities, memoranda of understanding and participation in government programmes cannot substitute for the required approval.
Contracting institutions have also been directed to verify the environmental permit status of projects before allowing contractors to mobilise to their sites.
The EPA acknowledged the importance of restoring lands and water bodies damaged by illegal and irresponsible mining but cautioned that rehabilitation efforts must not create further environmental destruction by bypassing regulatory safeguards.
It warned that individuals and institutions that continue unapproved operations after the notice would face action in accordance with applicable Ghanaian laws.
The directive reinforces the Authority’s position that environmental restoration, regardless of its funding source or purpose, must comply with the country’s permitting requirements.
General News
North Korea and China Open Long-Delayed Bridge
The opening of the long-awaited New Yalu River Bridge marks a significant step towards strengthening cross-border transport and trade between China and North Korea.
China and North Korea have officially opened a major bridge linking the two countries, ending a 12-year delay that kept the infrastructure project unused despite its completion in 2014.
The New Yalu River Bridge connects the Chinese border city of Dandong, in Liaoning province, with Sinuiju in North Korea. The four-lane crossing stretches approximately three kilometres across the Yalu River and is expected to improve the movement of goods between the neighbouring countries.
The project was originally intended to begin operating in 2014. However, the opening was postponed for years as infrastructure on the North Korean side, including connecting roads and customs facilities, remained incomplete. Analysts have also pointed to strained bilateral relations and disagreements surrounding economic cooperation as possible contributing factors.
Trade and economic implications
The new crossing is expected to ease pressure on the older China–North Korea Friendship Bridge, which has served as a major route for official trade between the two countries.
By providing additional road capacity, the new bridge could improve freight transportation, reduce congestion and support the movement of essential goods. Its strategic location is particularly important because China remains North Korea’s principal trading partner.
Nevertheless, the opening does not automatically guarantee a rapid increase in trade. International sanctions imposed in response to North Korea’s nuclear and weapons programmes continue to constrain economic activity, while the scale of future commercial traffic will depend on border arrangements and the two governments’ economic policies.
A signal of closer bilateral engagement
The bridge’s inauguration comes amid renewed diplomatic engagement between Beijing and Pyongyang. It also highlights China’s continued economic importance to North Korea as the latter seeks to maintain relationships with key regional partners.
For China, improved transport links could facilitate cross-border commerce and support economic activity in Dandong. For North Korea, the bridge offers additional capacity for importing goods and developing commercial infrastructure around Sinuiju.
However, the project’s long delay illustrates how political disagreements and economic considerations can obstruct infrastructure intended to improve regional connectivity.
What happens next?
Attention will now turn to how quickly the bridge becomes an established route for commercial traffic and whether the additional capacity translates into measurable growth in bilateral trade.
While the opening represents an important infrastructure milestone, its longer-term economic and diplomatic impact will depend on the willingness of both governments to sustain cooperation and the restrictions governing North Korea’s international trade.
The opening ends a lengthy wait for the two countries, but the bridge’s ultimate significance will be measured by the trade and cooperation it enables in the years ahead.
-
General News1 week agoWorld Cup Visa Storm: Kojo’s GTA Questions Resurface as Minority Demands Action
-
General News2 weeks agoSSNIT Unveils Big Plans to Transform Labadi, La Palm Beachfront into Tourism Hub
-
General News1 week agoPolitical communicators must prepare before speaking on teachers’ strike – Seth Afum Dankwah
-
Education2 weeks agoShould Schools Teach Students How to Handle Failure?
-
General News2 weeks agoUniversity of Ghana Announces Major Update on 2026/2027 Registration and Accommodation
-
General News2 weeks agoPolice Investigate Death of Three Children at Kobilmahigu; IGP Deploys Special Team
-
General News1 week agoUS Defense Department Cuts Ties With Anthropic Over AI Restrictions
-
Politics1 week agoGeorge Krobea Asante Alleges Deliberate Delay in Voting Process
